You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] larebil [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So you think in this case it's fine that 9 month old content is above all new content? On reddit, the way it works is that new content appears not at the top, but maybe 3-4 places down (for less active subs, like /r/denmark). So at least people would notice the content, and be able to choose whether to up/downvote it. I think this is fine. New content shouldn't appear in #1 spot, but at least toward the top. However in this specific case, I think all new concent should appear above 9 month old content.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] cctv 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's the Hot tab and it only requires one upvote from someone to "solve" the problem so I'm with you in this one!

0
0

[–] larebil [S] ago  (edited ago)

And how many people use the new tab - ie actively clicking to change the ranking? I don't and never did. I assume the site pushes hot/relevant things to the top. That's the way it ought to work. I wouldn't want to come back after 9 months and view the same exact content as when I left. Again, of course this is not a problem for really active subs. But most subs on here are not active, not yet. And they will stay inactive if all content that a new, casual user is going to see, is really old stuff.