You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

49
-42

[–] 12_Years_A_Toucan 49 points -42 points (+7|-49) ago 

well, @she isn't a SJW so there is that.

2
29

[–] mr_skeltal 2 points 29 points (+31|-2) ago 

Top kek. If you honestly believe that you are downright retarded. She is pro-PC, uses terms like mansplaining unironically and is an intersectional feminist. But yeah, totally not an SJW.

34
-30

[–] 12_Years_A_Toucan 34 points -30 points (+4|-34) ago  (edited ago)

Describe to me in the ways she has expressed the desire to force PC ideals on people, and then specifically on voat. She simply expressed the notion that those people railing against PC are bigots, and while an extreme representation of the idea not entirely false. The main concept being people only care about what affects them, I hate PC crap but I have a desire to be offensive. Now PC as a concept is absurd and many see that but most don't fucking care because it doesn't affect them, the ones railing against it tend to be offensive people, like me.

mansplaining unironically and is an intersectional feminist

Whiles those two terms and concepts are idiotic like I've said before I don't like or agree with her personal political views. I've also actually "spoken" to her, she isn't a SJW. There are nuances in life there are all sorts of view points, not every single one that takes part in some views is an extremist.

0
7

[–] spookybm 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I had a chuckle, thanks.

0
5

[–] spookybm 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

That's still a funny implication that you immediately thought I was pointing out the SJW factor. 2 are hate sites. She is supposedly one who is against the hating.

11
-11

[–] 12_Years_A_Toucan 11 points -11 points (+0|-11) ago 

How is it a funny implication? It's what half the people are talking about. Like I've said before, people have this magic ability to work with other people they disagree with.