0
18

[–] lllllllllll 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Also a feature that locks comments and prevents voting after a certain period would be great, so that even if someone goes through your history they can't up/downvote your older posts.

0
5

[–] moe 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

3
2

[–] wwwhistler 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

i would limit it to a lower percentage...10 to 15% sounds good.

3
-1

[–] maaaaa 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

I agree. I wouldn't be a tragedy to do away with downvotes altogether. If you're not disagreeing by downvoting they are rarely needed.

2
1

[–] SandorClegane 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Rather it be incremental. You could weed out the problem users with their patterns. Start at 10 move to 30.

0
0

[–] Broc_Lia ago 

Then they'll just spam four upvotes randomly whenever they want to downvote.

2
0

[–] haijak 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

You get one upvote per day for every 2 CCP you have.

I would give one downvote per day for every 100 CCP.

Honestly. That's how I assumed it worked before I reached 100 anyway. The rules don't actually say how many you get when you hit 100 CCP.

2
1

[–] 1934285? 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

I don't know, that almost seems like a "safe space" to me. Personally, I think that 25% is more than enough (since you can always just report spam rather than downvoat it, and there really isn't much that is really worthy of downvotes over than spam and trolls).

1
-1

[–] baneofretail 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I disagree. I believe that a user's upvoats and downvoats ability should be linked to their ccp using a median of their upvoated posts, including those that have been deleted and or removed.

2
-2

[–] umpaloompa 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

This and if you want to downvote you need to pay some of your SCP/CCP.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)