You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

10
0

[–] frankenmine [S] 10 points 0 points (+10|-10) ago 

Her comment history is being brigaded because this is the only way the community has to oust an unfit, malicious mod.

If we had a more civilized way of doing it, such as submitting a vote of no confidence, we would have done just that.

This is our vote of no confidence. This person is unfit to be a mod of a neutral 50K sub. They subscribe to an ideology that goes against everything Voat stands for, the very reason it was founded.

She can fuck off and mod /v/ShitVoatersSay.

5
6

[–] Broc_Lia 5 points 6 points (+11|-5) ago  (edited ago)

"The community" can migrate if it wants to (and is in the process of doing so), and there's no guarantee that a brigade will represent "the community." (insofar as an amorphous grouping can be represented by anyone)

This is our vote of no confidence. This person is unfit to be a mod of a neutral 50K sub. They subscribe to an ideology that goes against everything Voat stands for, the very reason it was founded.

I personally do not want to belong to another site which bases moderator positions on political reliability.

4
1

[–] frankenmine [S] 4 points 1 point (+5|-4) ago 

I personally do not want to belong to another site which bases moderator positions on political reliability.

Your SJW clique can migrate to another site if it wants to.

0
3

[–] CptCmdrAwesome 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If we had a more civilized way of doing it, such as submitting a vote of no confidence, we would have done just that.

Actually, we did. This was not the only one. For all the good any of them were worth.

The one I posted is currently two votes shy of 1,000 with an 88% approval rate, and does not even mention "SJW" or the personal views of any moderator, it only serves to register dissatisfaction with the moderation of that sub.

0
1

[–] frankenmine [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'm hoping we can automate this process, so that when a head mod transfer is about to happen, and regularly afterwards (say, every six months or a year) the community's approval is also required for the transfer to go through or the head mod to remain in place.

0
2

[–] Deathchild95 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Voat is all about freedom. If @she wants to super-moderate v/askvoat then it is her right at mod of a sub. Some people might even like it super moderated. But It is our freedom, if we do not like as subverse, to make an subverse that fits the niche that you want to find. We have 10 different subverse that talk about the same thing, they just do it slightly different and have different user bases.just move to the one that fits you best and avoid the others.

2
-1

[–] frankenmine [S] 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

It is our right to keep Voat devoted to free speech, which is why it was founded.

SJW ideology is opposed to free speech.

That's why SJWs should never be allowed to have any influence on Voat.

We have the right to do everything in our power to prevent them for attaining such influence.