You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
4

[–] gatordontplaythatsht [S] 4 points 4 points (+8|-4) ago 

If you're making a subverse only to get lots of subs and keep control then your motives don't serve the sub anyway. Moderators are meant to be servants of the community, not proud large sub owners.

1
11

[–] Antimatter 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Like I mentioned in a previous post, you can't really control how many subscribers your subverse gets. If the topic of your subverse suddenly gets popular, why should the moderator be punished? And how can you even know if a moderator will be corrupt? This is a case by case scenario. Not all mods go power hungry. The "good" mods shouldn't be punished due to the paranoia of corruption.

4
0

[–] gatordontplaythatsht [S] 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

why should the moderator be punished?

The fact that you think losing mod powers in punishment is the problem. Not being a mod doesn't ban you from contributing to the sub or discussions, so losing it shouldn't mean anything.