You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
46

[–] PuttItOut 2 points 46 points (+48|-2) ago 

Oh there you are! ;)

Rolling SCP/CCP would be my thinking, say over the year or 6 months to qualify as candidate/voter in elections.

[–] [deleted] 32 points 27 points (+59|-32) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

12
40

[–] gatordontplaythatsht [S] 12 points 40 points (+52|-12) ago 

If you're only here to grow "your creation" then you've missed the point of moderating subs. You're a community servant, not some great leader that is responsible for the entire subs content.

2
8

[–] Rigel 2 points 8 points (+10|-2) ago  (edited ago)

this is the kind of attitude that leads to the kind of reddit style fiefdom wherein little dictators feel empowered by the growth of "their" empire and thusly become the sort of tyrants that stamp out expression according to their own whims, making the site a crap hole in the process.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

2
10

[–] gatordontplaythatsht [S] 2 points 10 points (+12|-2) ago 

Hey @puttitout awesome to see you both at least checking this out.

0
0

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

@Putitout @Atko : Please don't implement this. It would be a disaster. Subs where mods can be voted out would be horrifically vulnerable to brigading.

2
0

[–] FitMachoNaziAtheist 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Went back to reddit, voat is no different.

0
0

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

So if a sub's popularity grows to the point where it's one of the largest subs, it gets taken over? Sorry, but no thanks. Subs should be able to keep their independence from the main community.