2
54

[–] PuttItOut 2 points 54 points (+56|-2) ago 

This is actually a great idea!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 35 points (+35|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
30

[–] PuttItOut 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago 

This is also a good idea. Dry up the supply, starve them out.

0
4

[–] tokui 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Have the barrier move. As the account ages + activity level.

Sleeper accounts suddenly rampage at will.

New accounts seemingly rampage out the gate.

0
1

[–] vtusr 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] CameraCode0 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think posting links to another voat page would be ok. I can't see much room for abuse there, but I could be dumb.

1
0

[–] fuchs_davis 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I disagree because I had a single guy go through my comment history, yesterday, giving downvotes until the system stopped him, not just to the ones from whatever post pissed him off.

[–] [deleted] 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
17

[–] Crensch [S] 1 point 17 points (+18|-1) ago 

@Puttitout

I actually like this one.

Why should someone that hasn't even contributed a hundred CCP be able to upvote things?

0
25

[–] PuttItOut 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

I like it because it guts why spammers spam: Links. Take links away from spammers and they have little incentive to spam.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

2
0

[–] A_Clockwork_Kubrick 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

I'm sort of new here and really don't care about internet points but I just looked and I have -39 CCP. What does that even mean?

0
1

[–] captainstrange 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This is the best idea so far.

The CCP should be tuned so that it acts as a break on how fast attitudes and site demographics can change.

0
7

[–] NPCGator 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I've reported that spammer so many times I lost count, I like this idea.

0
7

[–] Kalergi 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Maybe get rid of all the assholes I don't like, then it'd be just to cool people.

0
1

[–] tokui 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Good Plan.

0
0

[–] jimibulgin ago 

So the Jews?

0
5

[–] DayOfThePillow 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Why would you join a new website and submit links right away? If you had some truly important info you would just post it in the top thread and ask someone to repost it. 100 CCP sounds good.

0
5

[–] Goathole 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] spaceman84 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Whatever it takes. Build the wall ten feet higher.

0
2

[–] Goathole 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Throw broken glass on top and have machine gun towers every 100 yards.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
1

[–] Crensch [S] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

I appreciate that, kind stranger.

I don't honestly think it will effectively keep legitimate-seeming links from being visited. This is Voat. I bet if we could track such things, downvoted-to-collapsed comments are likely read at the same rate as the lowest non-collapsed comments.

If the link-breaking is automatic, it doesn't even inconvenience you, just the reader that wants to see, and if your words are otherwise decent, they'll put it together themselves without a problem, IMO.

0
0

[–] phillyjoe ago 

Join the club. I've been stuck since the Boomer Q tard invasion.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 3 points 4 points (+7|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] goatsandbros 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I'd tend to agree with a higher number, to get past those who get CCP for simply replying.

0
4

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I actually wouldn't mind that, either.

load more comments ▼ (21 remaining)