[–] smallpond 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I like the idea, though I guess it's low priority in the bigger scheme of things. You could have explained it better in your post.

As I understand it would assign a unique ID to each user in a thread, but that ID is only valid for that particular thread. It could be simply based on the order the comments are made, so that user "anonymous_first" is always the same person in one anonymous thread, but "anonymous_first" from a different anonymous thread is likely someone else.

Disclaimer: If we’re conversing, I will soon fall silent. I may want to continue, but because many users are unpopular here and have less than 100 CCP, we are temporarily banned as soon as we make 10 comments in a day. Voat does not respect free speech, but I'm grateful for recent comments stating an intention to improve things.

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Do you want to deanonymize threads even further?

[–] vouvraycabernetx [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No, I want to keep people from creating artificial disagree/agree circlejerks and self promotion. Look at how 8chan does it. Does it kill the anonymity?

[–] vmlinuz 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

May make such things more evident but doesn't prevent anything. Thing you should be more concerned with is if the site maintains a list of your anon ID's, anyone with access to their database now or in the future will have that reference too. A more serious risk afaic.