0
8

[–] AtheistComic 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Excellent idea. We should focus on transparency as being our #1 philosophy. I recommend looking at eff.org for insight.

0
1

[–] 517313 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

#2, next to anti-censorship.

Someone should write a voat constitution.

0
0

[–] mukt 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I volunteer for that.

1
8

[–] IveSeenYouNakid 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

That seems like an obvious choice. You have to wonder why that would be considered OK or a good idea in the first place...

0
0

[–] Amarok 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It was to stop trolls from doxing and harassing moderators who told them to fuck off with the banhammer. I'm not convinced it was any more effective than an ignore user button would have been.

38
-35

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] TheyKeepOnRising 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I think Mokum has a point, and it seems like too much to enforce this idea. If a shitlord mod does something that the other mods disagree with, they will know and respond. If they agree with that mod's actions, then most likely all the mods are shitlords.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] peacegnome [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

As long as there is a policy against it people will avoid it. It happened organically on that other site and I don't think that it would have as easily if it was against policy.

0
2

[–] Pwib 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The problem currently is that only the original mod has full powers, like the ability to ban. If they aren't very active, but other mods are, then it could be a problem for the other mods.

0
1

[–] Genghis_Khan 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This is why others can request inactive subs. I have a sneaking suspicion that the admins look at the current mods of a sub before handing it over.

0
5

[–] Pwib 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I don't mean inactive for 60 days. I mean a mod that only has time to come on on the weekends, for example.

0
1

[–] codyave 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Likely a dumb question, but will messages between mods be publicly available?

0
4

[–] immibis 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It wouldn't provide any advantage - bad mods would just use other forms of communication, or alternate accounts.

0
1

[–] codyave 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Ah, right. Potential for abuse. Motto of the internet: if it can be abused, it will.

0
0

[–] cooledcannon 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I dont get what the problem is...?

Shared accs seem okay as long as the original owner realises its likely able to be banned for actions the others do...

0
0

[–] Spaceape 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Not sure I fully understand the premise, but if it's a reference to what I think it is.

I've always loathed the idea of the coffee klatch especially if they are mods.

Having just started learning how these boards work and are modded. I realise how simple & powerful a tool they are for managing a message.Group mobilising is as old as the internet Cyber Sisters Transparency is IMO the best way to expose and balance it.