0
8

[–] MoomBah 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I like it.

0
1

[–] Super-Script 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I like it a lot.

0
3

[–] pseudopsynic 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] Managalar 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"multiverse" is already sufficiently pluralistic, you don't need the s.

0
0

[–] moons [S] ago 

but there are multiple sets which have multiple subverses. one set = one multiverse

0
1

[–] timholt 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] moons [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

well, its not that unique of an idea. interestingly enough, ive actually made my own post about this exact same scenario.

edit: here's another great mind https://voat.co/v/ideasforvoat/comments/44027

0
0

[–] bozarkin ago 

And /v/all is the univoat.

0
7

[–] jeegte12 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I would say universe, but that doesn't make any sense. Univoat sounds terrible though.

0
1

[–] moons [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

sup bozarkin. we were just arguing with each other.