You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] dijitao 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Will only result in Tyranny of the majority. We need a system were it's basically impossible for someone to come in and take the place over, direct democracy is the exact opposite of that. Here are some circumstances and how I think they should be dealt with.

Problem: Abusive Moderator

Solution: Moderation logs + a system for flagging an abusive mod. If people can make an informed decision they will just leave subverse with a bad moderator or owner to start a new community.

Problem: Brigading

Solution: Subverse owners need to make use of the per-subverse CCP setting. Unfortunately this removes the subverse from /v/all, this needs to be remedied so the feature can be taken advantage of.

Problem: Subverse Banning

Solution: Admin log with reason for why the subverse was banned. The list of valid reasons should essentially begin and end with engaged in illegal activity.

Problem: User Banning (site level)

Solution: Admin log, full transparency with reason provided

Problem: user Banning (subverse level)

Solution: Moderation log, full transparency with reason provided

etc....