You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Sure. Its guns, missiles, armor, and targeting systems are wholly inadequate, even compared with older ships still fielded by other navies. Neither ship has the armor to even meet the Navy's standards. Basically it's a combat ship that has no business being in combat and pretty much never will. It's the wrongest tool for the job possible (both ship classes). A little googling on this can yield you plenty to read about what I'm talking about. Here's a few:
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ShampocalypseWOW 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Sure. Its guns, missiles, armor, and targeting systems are wholly inadequate, even compared with older ships still fielded by other navies. Neither ship has the armor to even meet the Navy's standards. Basically it's a combat ship that has no business being in combat and pretty much never will. It's the wrongest tool for the job possible (both ship classes). A little googling on this can yield you plenty to read about what I'm talking about. Here's a few:
http://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2014/08/its-time-sink-lcs/92378/
http://www.wired.com/2013/01/littoral-combat-ship/
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/dear-us-navy-the-futuristic-x3k-is-the-littoral-combat-1644205558
http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2014/03/06/bring_on_the_frigate_lcs_is_outgunned_outclassed_107124.html
https://medium.com/war-is-boring/how-i-lost-the-battle-of-the-south-china-sea-c47b367a1de2