You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Downvoating is what reddit uses to silence dissenting views.
People don't typically upvoat, even if they like something. They will just look at it.
But when people get butthurt or see things they don't like they DO DOWNVOAT. You're assuming that people use both buttons the same way.
Voating is a censorship tool because it doesn't depend on rational argumentation. It only depends on CONSENSUS. That's why SRS use downvoat brigades because they know it's only purpose is to censor content they don't want seen by others.
Look, our entire political system should make it more practical. We don't let everyone vote in elections for a good reason: we know that retards are the majority of people. You want Bill Gate's educated vote negated by some homeless retard on the street? That's EXACTLY what democratic voting does. That's exactly what the movie Idiocracy was about. When you give everyone an equal say, you negate the point of education. You negate the point of rational argumentation. If a baby can negate the vote of an adult, then you don't really need to learn how to think. All you need to do is make people agree with you. And bribery is the fastest way to agreement.
Since people tend to downvoat when they're butthurt and engaged in censorship, the best way to combat censorship would be to only allow UPVOATING since people will actively have to champion what they believe rather than focus on what they want to complain about and censor. You can look at upvoating as positive censorship since it at least puts the burden on the upvoater to be accountable to their views and say what they prefer instead of simply complaining about what they don't want.
Stating what you want to happen takes EDUCATION AND EFFORT. Complaining about what you don't want just requires the ability to be butthurt.
I'd rather err on the side of positive censorship if we have to censor at all. We already know how negative censorship turns out: it becomes reddit.
At least positive censorship requires EFFORT that keyboard warriors aren't willing to invest. So if we want to make this place different from reddit, we should ONLY have an upvoat button.
And while we're at it, let's remove the scores from the profiles so keyboard warriors who are already socially retarded don't start jerking off to their fake internet power.
[+]1016839?0 points2 points2 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]1016839?0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
He didn't spend any time typing this. This has been copy/pasted around the site ever since the huge reddit exodus after Victoria's firing.
(This might have been on the site before that, but that's when I first started seeing it.)
He also has been known for replying to comments in any way going against the comment with this link
edit: changed some spacing
I just got to 100cp, and my downvotes are reserved for people like you who copy paste the same post all over the place. Here, have a downvote. They are shiny and new and have lots of friends.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] TheLetter10_ 29 points -27 points 2 points (+2|-29) ago
Voat's new censorship
Downvoating is what reddit uses to silence dissenting views.
People don't typically upvoat, even if they like something. They will just look at it.
But when people get butthurt or see things they don't like they DO DOWNVOAT. You're assuming that people use both buttons the same way.
Voating is a censorship tool because it doesn't depend on rational argumentation. It only depends on CONSENSUS. That's why SRS use downvoat brigades because they know it's only purpose is to censor content they don't want seen by others.
Look, our entire political system should make it more practical. We don't let everyone vote in elections for a good reason: we know that retards are the majority of people. You want Bill Gate's educated vote negated by some homeless retard on the street? That's EXACTLY what democratic voting does. That's exactly what the movie Idiocracy was about. When you give everyone an equal say, you negate the point of education. You negate the point of rational argumentation. If a baby can negate the vote of an adult, then you don't really need to learn how to think. All you need to do is make people agree with you. And bribery is the fastest way to agreement.
Since people tend to downvoat when they're butthurt and engaged in censorship, the best way to combat censorship would be to only allow UPVOATING since people will actively have to champion what they believe rather than focus on what they want to complain about and censor. You can look at upvoating as positive censorship since it at least puts the burden on the upvoater to be accountable to their views and say what they prefer instead of simply complaining about what they don't want.
Stating what you want to happen takes EDUCATION AND EFFORT. Complaining about what you don't want just requires the ability to be butthurt.
I'd rather err on the side of positive censorship if we have to censor at all. We already know how negative censorship turns out: it becomes reddit.
At least positive censorship requires EFFORT that keyboard warriors aren't willing to invest. So if we want to make this place different from reddit, we should ONLY have an upvoat button.
And while we're at it, let's remove the scores from the profiles so keyboard warriors who are already socially retarded don't start jerking off to their fake internet power.
[–] IgnorantLizard 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
Maybe I can't downvote you... But I sure as hell can upvoat you and then cancel it! Take that! now give it back...
[–] DeliciousApples ago
I can't even do this with my piss poor CCP. :(
[–] TheLetter10_ ago
sexay
[–] datjedi 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
you wasted a lot of time typing this shit
[–] 1016839? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
He didn't spend any time typing this. This has been copy/pasted around the site ever since the huge reddit exodus after Victoria's firing.
(This might have been on the site before that, but that's when I first started seeing it.)
He also has been known for replying to comments in any way going against the comment with this link
edit: changed some spacing
[–] TheLetter10_ 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
i love causing faggot retards like you extreme butthurt LOL! U MAD? :)
[–] Blackbart42 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I just got to 100cp, and my downvotes are reserved for people like you who copy paste the same post all over the place. Here, have a downvote. They are shiny and new and have lots of friends.
[–] TheLetter10- ago
for the sand in your pussy lol! :)
[–] martinidude ago
Why do you keep posting this all over the place?
[–] codyave 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
just a heads up, you're replying to a well-known reddit troll. if you can, downvote him, and report his comments as spam.
[–] TheLetter10_ 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
world peace