You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 6 points -3 points (+3|-6) ago 

[Deleted]

0
8

[–] SweetChicken 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Incorrect. If there weren’t explosives involved there would have been far more large pieces. Instead almost every square inch was turned to dust. Impossible without an accelerant

2
0

[–] Cat-hax 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

That's pushing it, concrete smacking into it self at high speeds will turn it into dust. Just look at other controlled demos when they use explosives to just take out lower supports.

2
-2

[–] MehWhatever 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Actually, it's the complete opposite. Explosives are pretty bad at pulverizing concrete. This goes into more detail than you'd ever want and at the end goes into what would the effects be if explosives were used instead:

http://www.911myths.com/WTCONC1.pdf

You can skip the the conclusion at the end if you don't want to dig through all the explanation and math.

0
1

[–] BearDolphin1488 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

so why did we fight israel border wars for the next 20 years?

0
0

[–] MehWhatever 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Because the government never fails to capitalize on a tragedy.