You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] hels [S] 5 points 33 points (+38|-5) ago 

I have not heard one reasonable argument that can explain the collapse of building 7. A fire at the top of the building? Anyone with half a brain knows that buildings are built to code and don't fall down easily.

[–] kammmmak 4 points 21 points (+25|-4) ago  (edited ago)

There is no reasonable argument needed to explain what happened. It was a simple controlled demolition and they even clearly say to bring it down ffs. They just always try to make us question what happened never being sure but we all know it was an inside job of the highest jew magnitude.

[–] Honey_Pot 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[–] Dial_Indicator 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago 

I have not heard one reasonable argument that can explain the collapse of building 7.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I

pretty fucking clear if ask me

[–] 4ChinSnacker 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

too bad the paper trails for several trillion taxpayer dollars were in building 7. how convienent mr. silverstein.

[–] TheTrigger 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Oh, man. That was unexpectedly funny.

[–] Rakosman 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The two sketchiest parts two me are building 7 and the fact that skyscrapers (especially those ones) are designed to be able to withstand full speed jet impacts.