[–] Dial_Indicator 4 points 50 points (+54|-4) ago 

building 7 .... all you have to say

[–] hels [S] 5 points 33 points (+38|-5) ago 

I have not heard one reasonable argument that can explain the collapse of building 7. A fire at the top of the building? Anyone with half a brain knows that buildings are built to code and don't fall down easily.

[–] kammmmak 4 points 21 points (+25|-4) ago  (edited ago)

There is no reasonable argument needed to explain what happened. It was a simple controlled demolition and they even clearly say to bring it down ffs. They just always try to make us question what happened never being sure but we all know it was an inside job of the highest jew magnitude.

[–] Honey_Pot 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[–] Dial_Indicator 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago 

I have not heard one reasonable argument that can explain the collapse of building 7.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I

pretty fucking clear if ask me

[–] Rakosman 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The two sketchiest parts two me are building 7 and the fact that skyscrapers (especially those ones) are designed to be able to withstand full speed jet impacts.

[–] nomadriders 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

building 6 as well, it blew up while the other towers were still burning, watch https://youtu.be/WZBhWRzt-aA?t=22

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wow, they fucked that up.

[–] Jabiluka 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I think Building 6 was blown up to cover for the explosions going off at street level in the towers.

[–] TomTheGeek 3 points 13 points (+16|-3) ago 

What's the significance of this?

[–] hels [S] 5 points 16 points (+21|-5) ago 

The steel/concrete core is what prevents a building falling down on itself. The core doesn't break apart and will not 'melt' from a fire.

Think about a fire stories higher that actually could melt steel and break concrete (it can't but we'll pretend). So what happened to the steel/concrete below this? Steel bends and concrete remains the way it is so why did the buildings all collapse straight down?

[–] SweetChicken 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

Not only that but also turn into a pyroclastic flow? How did all those thousands of tons of concrete simply turn to dust?

[–] l_voated_today 4 points 11 points (+15|-4) ago 

The twin towers were supported by the perimeter framework.

[–] hafen 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I heard that the engineering was unique for it's time in that weight was supported by exterior columns.

[–] Pseudonym888 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

The rate of gravity was accelerated ×3. It took 4.8 seconds to collapse. If you stood on top of a building 1,200 ft dropped a 20 pound anvil it would take 12.8 seconds to hit the ground. Concrete, which is carbon and C4/termite have the same co-efficient of expansion. https://youtu.be/oV0yHn11RDw

The person on that video claims by triggering a c4 detonation all anything concrete/with a 'carbon' molecular structure was instantly turned into dust leading to the remaining suspended structure to neatly pile down in 4.8 seconds. The big white cloud of dust is toxic asbestos which was carried away by the wind but also the suspect reason for the high incidence of cancer cases among first responders /survivors.

9/11 was/is the biggest spectacle I have ever seen in my life. Just to start a perpetual war. Wow

[–] TheAntiZealot 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

The official 9/11 investigative report states that jet fuel entered the elevator shaft and melted the core of the building, causing it to collapse (in free fall) at the rate of gravity.

[–] bb22 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Actually neither the NIST nor the FEMA report say that, but hardly anyone actually takes the time to dig through what they actually said. They're still bullshit, but that wasn't their argument.

[–] Pseudonym888 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No. The rate of freefall was accelerated ×3 the normal rate.

[–] Guy_Justsome 6 points -1 points (+5|-6) ago 

It proves the saboteur demolition experts forgot to plant their beam-cutting thermite explosives on the building's support structure.

It narrows down the pool of suspects to "mental retards with dynamite."

[–] KILLtheRATS 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago 

The Jew will pay for what he has done

[–] XSS1337 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No . They will all burn in the final Shoah .

[–] mrfetus 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Payment in full.

[–] SyriansAreTerrorists 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Damn jews

[–] theshopper 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I don't know if its scrubbed from the internet but there was a video interview with the guy who owned the wtc towers including building 7 saying that once he heard about the extent of the damage told his guys to "Pull it"

[–] the_sharpest_knife 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[–] theshopper 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

AND PEOPLE THINK I"M CRAZY WHEN I TALK ABOUT THE JEWS FOR FUCKS SAKE!!!!!!

That's the fucking clip!

[–] modsrcuntz 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

How did it disintegrate?...industrial steel turned to dust in front of our eyes...wtf?

[–] riposte 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago 

Thermite/ate. It didn't turn to dust, it just came apart in very precise cuts. Disinfo will tell you of directed energy weapons, or some other pseudo-science that makes 9/11 truthers look retarded, but it was simply a very standard building demolition. The explosive substances were found in tests, and we see the blasts taking out windows as the building collapses.

What is the most telling is that the structural support was still standing when the building fell, and then this extremely strong support fell on it's own despite being capable of holding up multiple times the weight of the building.

[–] Doglegwarrior 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

If you cant tell that the cia or some ass hole goverment agency came up with the disinformation shit to make truthers look bad then nothing is going to help you long term anyways.. you are just too stupid for life.

[–] 4ChinSnacker 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

dustification. the towers didnt burn up, didnt slam into the ground. but debris turned to dust as it fell one hundred stories to the ground. DUSTIFICATION. dr. judy wood explains it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ermHx3akejc . Also explains building 7, the toasted cars, jumpers, faster than freefall collapse, lack of debris and how there were survivors on the bottom floors and the absence of typical office materials (desks, chairs) but the passport of the sandnigger hijacker was left intact......just a rich mans trick.

[–] sunshine702 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Remember Dorner the cop turned cop killer in CA. He also died in a massive cabin fire but his licence was also spared. Impressive plastic.

[–] Pseudonym888 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

Yes. Anything carbon was dustified instantly.

[–] Pseudonym888 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thermodynamics. Triggering an explosive that has the same co-efficient of thermal expansion with a steel structure.

Concrete was turned to dust, paper was floating in the air. Genius stuff.

[–] MehWhatever 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

LOL, what?

[–] ShineShooter 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Wow, a real lif expert!

[–] Fuckyounigger 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

this account has been laying low all of its life all to amount to this day where they tell us jet fuel cant melt steel beams

[–] GassyMcGasface 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Jews!

load more comments ▼ (20 remaining)