Welcome to Gaming! Come chat with us in the GoatChat network (desktop users click here). We also have an Official Steam Group.
All sub rules are defined in detail here and open for feedback
-
Submissions must be related to gaming.
-
Titles must be clear and reflect content of the submission. Include game titles where necessary.
-
No Clickbait (defined).
-
No links to illegal torrents or other illegal downloads/content.
-
No link posts to merchandise and/or unrelated products (exceptions).
-
Mark all spoilers with: [](#s "Text goes here")
-
Mark all NSFW posts appropriately.
-
Submissions reposted within 6 months will be removed.
Content creators, please read our community Content Creator Guidelines
What you're encouraged to post:
Games! We should talk about games more than anything! New releases, old favorites, Speed Runs, Let's Play's, development news, what we love, what we hate and so on and so forth.
Try to post things that create discussion. We want people to feel engaged and feel their voices are heard, rather than to be a place of disposable content.
If you're not sure, ask!
If you wish to, you can archive your posts here.
Check out v/gaming's megathread of gaming-related subverses
Sort: Top
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
[–] poopbutt 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hypothetically that is a publisher's wet dream, but I don't think it will come to that.
It's like saying all games will become F2P, P2W games; The concept has been around for a while and while there are plenty of those around, most of them are stupid Facebook / mobile games for stupid people, while the vast majority of "real" games haven't adopted those mechanics yet, because the core group of customers just wouldn't adopt them. Sure some of that stuff creeps into high profile games every now and then, but the more ridiculous incarnations get called out pretty hard and the games often end up being a financial disaster for the publishers because ridiculous F2P / P2W concepts (as opposed to rather benign versions like TF2, DOTA, etc.) just don't work with certain genres (like typical high profile single player games) and competition will take care of the rest. Similarly, say, online FPS games won't ever work with streaming technology because of the inherent input lag (which you will never get rid of). Any game doing this will be a financial disaster and people will stick to the competition that doesn't force that technology.
Besides, the current digital distribution model already offers most of those benefits you mentioned but with the huge advantage of significantly reduced cost. The infrastructure cost of hosting server farms that actually play and render these games for distribution to the clients is an entirely different ballpark from hosting file servers that just offer the game's install data for transfer to the clients (and which in practice is today just a cut to Valve because Steam will take care of that anyway), so there is little for publishers to gain over the current model.
[–] Stork 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's cool!
[–] 7H3-L4UGH1NG-M4N 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
And indie devs who can't afford to do online mode rejoice!
[–] wufather 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Ok, that is really cool. Wish I could have outsourced most of the first chapter of MGS:V TPP. It got really repetitive and boring. I just found out there is a "Chapter 2" though which looks pretty cool. Maybe I'll be able to show some friends how great this game looks.
[–] Arcolite ago
I wonder how this compares to Steam In-Home Streaming?