You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] therealkrispy ago 

It's impossible to directly compare the two, as price and performance don't line up between any of their opposing SKUs, and so it makes more sense to look at individual parts, as the architectures alone don't even tell the whole story. They're not on the same lithography, they're not using the same VRAM, and much of the die size on Turing is consumed by tensor and RT cores. On top of that, Vega isn't dead yet, and is likely to be iterated on for years to come.

1
3

[–] areejs [S] 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

If you read the piece it's not a comparison. It highlights the differences between the two architectures and explains how they achieve the same goal

0
2

[–] therealkrispy 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That's entirely fair, but the article and its contents do not make it a good title.