You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] no_censorship_bruh ago 

Yeah. You could go for the argument that they specialize for "game" connections and as a result be "faster", but the fact that it just tunnels through your regular Internet connection from what your ISP provided you'll still get the same latency, if not more. The bottleneck of the connections will be the line the game server leased from their ISP, which will have all multiple connections already if the game is popular, and your line from your ISP. Even if the number of hops your connection to the game server will take using WTFast is lower compared to using without it, the game server's lines will still be congested.

When I did my testing while I used it, the route that was used with or without WTFast didn't change. The peering between countries still sucked, which what made me check solutions for it and saw the said service, and I got same or higher latency.

If it worked for you and you got 10+, 40+, 100+ ms off your latency, you should continue using it if you are satisfied.