Welcome to Gaming! Come chat with us in the GoatChat network (desktop users click here). We also have an Official Steam Group.
All sub rules are defined in detail here and open for feedback
-
Submissions must be related to gaming.
-
Titles must be clear and reflect content of the submission. Include game titles where necessary.
-
No Clickbait (defined).
-
No links to illegal torrents or other illegal downloads/content.
-
No link posts to merchandise and/or unrelated products (exceptions).
-
Mark all spoilers with: [](#s "Text goes here")
-
Mark all NSFW posts appropriately.
-
Submissions reposted within 6 months will be removed.
Content creators, please read our community Content Creator Guidelines
What you're encouraged to post:
Games! We should talk about games more than anything! New releases, old favorites, Speed Runs, Let's Play's, development news, what we love, what we hate and so on and so forth.
Try to post things that create discussion. We want people to feel engaged and feel their voices are heard, rather than to be a place of disposable content.
If you're not sure, ask!
If you wish to, you can archive your posts here.
Check out v/gaming's megathread of gaming-related subverses
view the rest of the comments →
[–] WesusJept 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I think QTEs are fine.
[–] torky ago
Bleh. I love how cool looking QTE's are, but they remove the player's control of the character down to "press x to not die". I'd prefer if it were up to some sort of rock-paper-scissors deal.
It'll go like this
Player gets a moment to react
If successful, the QTE continues. If not, the player gets damaged.
It gives the player some option while retaining the cool moves done in QTE.
[–] WesusJept ago
I said they were fine, not the second coming of Christ. And I don't see how your idea doesn't remove the players control, you're just adding an extra layer of unnecessary stuff to the formula of "Press this button before it disappears or die/get damaged"