You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
12

[–] Yuke 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

But...with the application of AI that target is always being drawn on our backs (or should that be faces?). It is also continually analyzing and learning. Just because we get savvy to the well-established or found-out advertising methods doesn't mean they ever stop, in fact, as this shows, it will only get more and more severe.

The level of intrusiveness on display here is highly disturbing and it makes me lose faith in humanity that there are people out there right now thinking these things and NOT seeing how they are systematically ruining the world with what they are doing. Anything for a sale, huh?

0
0

[–] TXROADWARRIOR ago 

You are absolutely right. It almost sounded like the person you replied to was advocating for the system

0
0

[–] NotHereForPizza ago 

Here's the thing about humans: every single person in any of our recent memory which had substantially meaningful independent thoughts is well known by name. Sure, there may be more that expressed themselves differently. But, every field of science has celebrity type figures in its history which all tell tales of independent thought that revolutionized that particular field or interest.

Why is this important? Because someone, like, you know, a human, has to code this A. I. Therefore, if an extreme majority of coders all think alike, then I'm sure there's a slightly less extreme portion who will be able to figure out some kinks.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not here say how wrong everyone is about this, but my idea is that everyone might want to settle down a bit. We're still likely a ways away from developing A. I. that codes other A. I. en masse.

0
0

[–] Plavonica ago  (edited ago)

We're still likely a ways away from developing A.I. that codes other A.I.

That's actually a current area of research.