Welcome to Gaming! Come chat with us in the GoatChat network (desktop users click here). We also have an Official Steam Group.
All sub rules are defined in detail here and open for feedback
-
Submissions must be related to gaming.
-
Titles must be clear and reflect content of the submission. Include game titles where necessary.
-
No Clickbait (defined).
-
No links to illegal torrents or other illegal downloads/content.
-
No link posts to merchandise and/or unrelated products (exceptions).
-
Mark all spoilers with: [](#s "Text goes here")
-
Mark all NSFW posts appropriately.
-
Submissions reposted within 6 months will be removed.
Content creators, please read our community Content Creator Guidelines
What you're encouraged to post:
Games! We should talk about games more than anything! New releases, old favorites, Speed Runs, Let's Play's, development news, what we love, what we hate and so on and so forth.
Try to post things that create discussion. We want people to feel engaged and feel their voices are heard, rather than to be a place of disposable content.
If you're not sure, ask!
If you wish to, you can archive your posts here.
Check out v/gaming's megathread of gaming-related subverses
view the rest of the comments →
[–] intrepiddemise ago
Catherine the Great, Queen Elizabeth I, Margaret Thatcher, Joan of Arc, Marie Curie, Mother Theresa...these were all horrible leaders in your mind? It is not impossible for women and gay men to be both capable leaders and right-leaning instead of left-leaning. Right-wing ideologies are not necessarily about traditional social roles. Traditionalism does not belong solely to the right; it comes in many forms. Forced traditionalism, though, that's just authoritarianism. If that's what you're advocating, then just come out and say it and stop using traditionalist conservatives as cover. You're literally advocating executing gays that have "come out." If that's not authoritarianism, I don't know what is.
I asked about what leadership is to you, not what it isn't. Your immigration non-sequitur notwithstanding. If all it takes to be a good leader is to shut the borders of your country to immigrants, then there are a bunch of Central American presidents that fit that bill. You don't find it extremely narrow-minded to assume that agreeing with you on one policy issue makes someone a good leader?