You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] ChillyHellion [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That's good feedback. Personally I don't have a problem with community rules as long as they're in the community's control. Downvoats can curate content, but often don't provide a clear way of communicating just why the content was shot down.

Mods have the job of communicating and enforcing a community's rules so that a post that might have been buried in downvoats can instead end up contributing to the sub in a positive way. Posts with clickbait titles, for example, can benefit from having someone in a moderator role explain the community's stance on clickbait and help an OP understand what they can do to improve that post and meet the community's guidelines.

I have no desire to dictate what rules /v/gaming needs, and I'd rather step down than enforce a rule I don't feel right in applying. My job is to assist the will of the community whichever way it decides.


[–] sakuramboo 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's not the mods or owners job to regulate behavior. That's the reddit style of moderating and one of the main reasons why we are on Voat.

Any rules that go outside the realm of the subject matter is not needed. And any rules that dictate behavior only pushes people away. For example, if you truly care about not seeing spoilers, make a new subverse, call it /v/spoilfreegaming, and go ahead and talk about video games but without talking about what happens in them. Just like how there is a /v/nsfwgaming (though only 2 posts), it's a more specific subject than just gaming. But, rules 2, 3, 4, and 6 can still spawn discussions. So what if a title is clickbaity? Hell, many gaming sites use clickbait titles. If the article is decent, that rule will still punish the user who posts it (if they don't bother to editorialize the title).

If the users don't like it, let them downvoat and move on. The owner/mods should never be the gatekeepers of what the users can see.

As for comments, I say fuck it. Unless the comment is breaking a site wide rule (ie. posting a dox, link to CP, etc.) let the community vote. But, never delete a comment (aside from site wide rule breaks). If someone wants to explain why a comment got downvoted, let someone comment and explain. Don't delete it because you don't like it but rather because it violates a site wide rule. If a user has their panties in a twist and cursing at everyone, leave it. They will get downvoted and face the consequences of possible ccp restriction. You don't build a community by regulating behavior but by being engaging with the users.