Welcome to Gaming! Come chat with us in the GoatChat network (desktop users click here). We also have an Official Steam Group.
All sub rules are defined in detail here and open for feedback
-
Submissions must be related to gaming.
-
Titles must be clear and reflect content of the submission. Include game titles where necessary.
-
No Clickbait (defined).
-
No links to illegal torrents or other illegal downloads/content.
-
No link posts to merchandise and/or unrelated products (exceptions).
-
Mark all spoilers with: [](#s "Text goes here")
-
Mark all NSFW posts appropriately.
-
Submissions reposted within 6 months will be removed.
Content creators, please read our community Content Creator Guidelines
What you're encouraged to post:
Games! We should talk about games more than anything! New releases, old favorites, Speed Runs, Let's Play's, development news, what we love, what we hate and so on and so forth.
Try to post things that create discussion. We want people to feel engaged and feel their voices are heard, rather than to be a place of disposable content.
If you're not sure, ask!
If you wish to, you can archive your posts here.
Check out v/gaming's megathread of gaming-related subverses
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ArsCortica ago
Read the article, but really can't agree with it. Of course you can argue that Steam having ever-more titles on it is simply a result of it getting older, but I'm fairly certain that they also decreased the quality standards quite a bit, with shovelware and games that you previously would have fund for free on flash sites making it virtually impossible to find good non-AAA titles. The new Greenlight system doesn't help, and when the author argues that a game that doesn't get released on Steam is dead, I'd reply that it doesn't matter whether it's released there or not, because no-one can find the damned thing.