Welcome to Gaming! Come chat with us in the GoatChat network (desktop users click here). We also have an Official Steam Group.
All sub rules are defined in detail here and open for feedback
-
Submissions must be related to gaming.
-
Titles must be clear and reflect content of the submission. Include game titles where necessary.
-
No Clickbait (defined).
-
No links to illegal torrents or other illegal downloads/content.
-
No link posts to merchandise and/or unrelated products (exceptions).
-
Mark all spoilers with: [](#s "Text goes here")
-
Mark all NSFW posts appropriately.
-
Submissions reposted within 6 months will be removed.
Content creators, please read our community Content Creator Guidelines
What you're encouraged to post:
Games! We should talk about games more than anything! New releases, old favorites, Speed Runs, Let's Play's, development news, what we love, what we hate and so on and so forth.
Try to post things that create discussion. We want people to feel engaged and feel their voices are heard, rather than to be a place of disposable content.
If you're not sure, ask!
If you wish to, you can archive your posts here.
Check out v/gaming's megathread of gaming-related subverses
Sort: Top
[–] SkepticalMartian 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It was about profit and no other reason. Why sell a game when you can sell a game and an animation?
[–] Aged [S] ago
Making a CGI movie in theory would cost well more than one single level in a game who is already partly made....unless is this endlessly-postponed game whose first director is a cloud-cuckoolander that can't even keep his ideas on the ground.
Look, I will not say profit is a reason, but Tetsuya Nomura wasted years and money from Square Enix and if they did spin-offs cartoon and movie to try to recuperate the money, then to me it's fair.