Welcome to Gaming! Come chat with us in the GoatChat network (desktop users click here). We also have an Official Steam Group.
All sub rules are defined in detail here and open for feedback
-
Submissions must be related to gaming.
-
Titles must be clear and reflect content of the submission. Include game titles where necessary.
-
No Clickbait (defined).
-
No links to illegal torrents or other illegal downloads/content.
-
No link posts to merchandise and/or unrelated products (exceptions).
-
Mark all spoilers with: [](#s "Text goes here")
-
Mark all NSFW posts appropriately.
-
Submissions reposted within 6 months will be removed.
Content creators, please read our community Content Creator Guidelines
What you're encouraged to post:
Games! We should talk about games more than anything! New releases, old favorites, Speed Runs, Let's Play's, development news, what we love, what we hate and so on and so forth.
Try to post things that create discussion. We want people to feel engaged and feel their voices are heard, rather than to be a place of disposable content.
If you're not sure, ask!
If you wish to, you can archive your posts here.
Check out v/gaming's megathread of gaming-related subverses
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Marijuana_Merlin 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
LMAO they never addressed crap in this post. I understand the point they made about giving them the time to work on how to integrate other "Arks" om the future with this DLC.
However they seem to have missed the whole point of the controversy and just pandered into the hands of the fanboys who already bought they DLC to further validate their reasoning when they bought it.
It was about the content.
It wasnt about the price.
It was about them doing a quick money grab with it. Had they wanted to do it right they should have offered it to all EA players to play while the base game is still in early access with the point being made that once it was fully released they would have to anti up the 20 bucks there and then to play SE further.