0
29

[–] AnoInc 0 points 29 points (+29|-0) ago 

Tldl: Clinton refused to debate sanders. Sanders goes on to debate Trump. THEY'RE BOTH SEXIST!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
15

[–] green_man 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

The act of supporting hillary requires said supporters to go full retard.

0
5

[–] Samchay6 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Robert Downey Jr.

A better black guy than an actual black guy

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
12

[–] brandon816 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Well, he -did- want to debate her in California, and they -did- have something worked out. But, Clinton's team backed out for some reason. What can you do?

0
7

[–] iwasnotshadowbanned 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I think the sentiment is silly but why on earth should we care? There are billions of people on this earth with really dumb opinions and unless this one is specifically related to the Hilldawg campaign I have no idea why we should care what they think.

0
0

[–] DoomMantia 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Because mindless circlejerking is considered funny /v/funny material on Voat.

0
4

[–] Foobarbaz 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I have a friend who strongly views the world as misogynistic. I think she's accustomed to thinking the world is against her all the time. As in, not by luck -- but the world maliciously is stacked against females purposely.

Personally, I believe it's an evolutionary thing and less about intentions and more about practicality. Changing from "men work, women watch kids" to "anyone can work and anyone can watch the kids" isn't an easy transition. She's one of those that thinks these kinds of changes can happen over night failing to understand the psychology of being human. I'd LOVE for the world to be fair for every race and gender but that's simply not the case. I'd like for blind people to be able to see too... but that's not the case.

0
6

[–] luckyguy 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I'm going to say something "mysogonistic." Men should work and women should watch kids. That's called deviding up the tasks by biological aptitude. If the aptitudes are reversed then the role should reverse but in more cases the aptitudes are not reversed.

Oh wait, according to the dictionary even that is not misogynistic. The goal post has been moved so fucking far.

1
2

[–] afsa 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

It really is a simple switch from "men work, women watch the kids" to "anyone can do whatever the fuck they feel like." The only barrier is if you care what other people think about what it is you are doing, which no one should be doing. Do you, fuck everyone else and their opinionated asses.

0
2

[–] TerriChris [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They whine after everyone does what they want, when RESULTS are not "equal"

0
2

[–] ginganinja 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"Well, we'll have our own debate! With anti-establishment and truths!"

0
1

[–] ImJustBigBoned 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

So, obviously this person would agree that Clinton was being sexist when she refused to debate Sanders, right?

0
1

[–] Samchay6 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yes, it is sexist.

Having a heated discussion about the dire issues facing our nation in the hopes of refining ideas that will shape policy thereby shaping the future of our nation. This vital process will require logic and reason to devise meaningful solutions, putting women at an inherent disadvantage. Furthermore, if all you have to play at this point is your oppression card to dodge debating the points that make you best qualified to protect our interests as leaders of the free world against the other candidates. Fuck your fake oppression, you're not up to snuff, Hill-Dog.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)