0
22

[–] Dashippy 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

This goes against everything the internet has told me about jet fuel and steel beams.

9
11

[–] Volcris 9 points 11 points (+20|-9) ago  (edited ago)

That whole thing just pisses me off, you don't have to completely melt the beam, just weaken its strength against compression, which happens long before the temperature required to melt it. Hell, a blacksmith heats steel to bellow melting point to hammer out a sword, any layman can picture cherry red unmelted steel being pounded out into a blade, that metal is obviously far more pliable while heated than when it's cooled. Grump.

Edit: not saying you are anything more than quoting the meme, just had that rant to get off.

3
23

[–] turdovski 3 points 23 points (+26|-3) ago 

Problem here is that there were beams found that looked like they were cut at an angle. https://cotocrew.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/911donotinvestigatese9.gif

Either way, this whole thermite or melted beams or whatever doesn't matter. The important thing is that the government knew about this terrorist plot, and let them carry it out to launch their mass surveillance and Iraq campaign.

4
14

[–] jervybingly 4 points 14 points (+18|-4) ago  (edited ago)

If you use kerosene, jet fuel, in a blast furnace the steel beams begin to weaken after around twenty hours. The first building fell less than an hour after it was hit, and the fires were basically out, with people waving from openings. The melted-beams explanation is ridiculous, as every architect and engineer knows.

1
3

[–] calmlikeabomb 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Okay smarty pant, how do you explain W.T.C. 7.....? drops mic

3
3

[–] bleatingnonsense 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, no need to melt the beam to have the structure fail. But you do need the beams to melt to have pools of melted iron as a result, and thats what happened. Really dude, 9/11 is one big hoax. Do take the time the read about it, its all over the internet, with sources, proofs, the whole shabang.

Edit: Or downvote and stay ignorant, your choice.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Subtenko 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

What about the box of chocolates from forest gump?! specifically mold number 7, 3rd row?

0
1

[–] 0x5f3759df 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The fuel itself not, no. But when you mix it with the chem-trail stuff, it burns way hotter.

1
12

[–] Troll 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

This is not true. We all know steel beams were seduced by thermite right after swearing fealty to airplane penetration.

3
9

[–] pipispapas 3 points 9 points (+12|-3) ago 

[–] [deleted] 3 points 6 points (+9|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

0
8

[–] pipispapas 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

1
2

[–] bleatingnonsense 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

You know thats not true though right? You just wanted to bring spiderman in the post right?

0
8

[–] pipispapas 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

1
4

[–] skhin 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Architect here! We had a discussion about this and our resident structural engineer that was high rise expert says that it was highly impossible to melt and have the building fall like that without taking out key structural members in that short of time. And all the steel beams have flame resistant spray. This engineer has been practicing for 60 years .. most likely retired now since it was 15 years ago.

1
4

[–] RottenSausage 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Why were there rivers of molten steel in that put for weeks after the WTC came down?

1
2

[–] QuestionEverything 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Building seven says: Nothing to see here. Just a complete anomaly of science which we've decided not to report on.

1) If fire caused Building 7 to collapse, it would be the first ever fire-induced collapse of a steel-frame high-rise.

2) Building 7’s collapse was not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.

3) According to a Zogby poll in 2006, 43% of Americans did not know about Building 7.

4) It took the federal government seven years to conduct an investigation and issue a report for Building 7.

5) 1,700+ architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation into the destruction of Building 7, specifying that it should include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives.

6) Numerous witnesses say the possibility of demolishing Building 7 was widely discussed by emergency personnel at the scene and advocated by the building’s owner.

7) Building 7 housed several intelligence and law enforcement agencies, and the NYC Office of Emergency Management’s Emergency Operations Center, more commonly known as “Giuliani’s Bunker”.

In addition to the Twin Towers and Building 7, the World Trade Center complex included buildings 3, 4, 5, and 6. Compared to Building 7, all of these buildings were severely damaged, first by falling rubble from the tower collapses, then by fires that burned for hours. Although these buildings were in critical condition, none of them collapsed.

0
2

[–] apoptosis15 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

1
2

[–] mamwad 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I ain't even thinking about dating until after Valentines. Too expensive of an investment starting out.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)