0
191

[–] Zaqwert 0 points 191 points (+191|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A strong, independent woman!

"Please buy me stuff"

0
100

[–] cynoclast 0 points 100 points (+100|-0) ago 

$1650 for a computer.

You could build a PC for half that that would work just fine.

0
78

[–] chags 0 points 78 points (+78|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A PC? PC???

Why are you trying to diminish this woman making her use something that was not created by Jobs, the Great? Oh, the patriarchy!

0
20

[–] thesuperpapagai 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

If Anita tried to build a computer, we all know how it would turn out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4pZGPlAKVM

0
6

[–] midterms 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Yeah a desktop pc with a good processor would smash really well with video production for about $1k. But the real question is how does she not have any money?!?

0
3

[–] JimboBillyBobJustice 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I just built a system on PC PArt Picker even with top o da line gear I could not reach 1650$...she must be planning on buying an over-priced fruit computer

[–] [deleted] 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
9

[–] Man_With_Da_Plan 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I'll give you the first two, however my understanding of "fraud" makes the third point illegal.

0
7

[–] 3dk 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Who knew that attention whoring could be so profitable?

0
7

[–] deltasly 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Please, don't think we're all like that.

The best of us stand on our own merits.

0
3

[–] threelite 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I hope none of us think like that. We're just mocking the person who says the "damsels in distress" trope is a negative thing while constantly stating she's in distress and needs our help.

2
0

[–] TheBeesTrees 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

The misogyny on this site sometimes worries me. I like to see a girl getting some upvotes.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 131 points (+131|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
46

[–] im_the_dude_man 0 points 46 points (+46|-0) ago 

Nice grab man, it irks me that people do not see her for the charlatan she is.

0
17

[–] 6double5321 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

Plus one for proper use of a word.

0
7

[–] spacebob 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm not going to defend her or w/e, but you should have posted the next post as well. It sheds some light...

Edit: more on topic. I have no words for it, it's just sad...


Fmr Tax accountant here, I can shed some light.

4) Feminist Frequency reports fundraising expenses of $26,344. What were these expenses? The report does not say.

It does say it, it's listed as wages/salary for fund raising. Probably they hired a sole-proprietor and sent out a 1099-Misc. It's not correct to list this as wages, but it's not a "go to jail" kind of mistake

6) What, exactly, does Feminist Frequency do? Do they actually have any programs in place that benefit the public? In the Statement of Program Service Accomplishments there is a single item, "STARTING UP OPERATIONS FULFILLING MISSION STATEMENT". That's it. No specific programs either current or planned and no specific accomplishments.

The answer is listed in part one "Analyze media and advocate just treatement online"

8) Feminist Frequency checked Yes when asked if they had more than $15,000 in expenses for professional fundraising services. Yet in schedule G Part I 2a they checked off No when asked if the organization had any "written or oral agreement with any individual ... in connection with professional fundraising services". This seems contradictory to me. What were the more than $15000 in "professional fundraising expenses" then?

It's the ~$26k under fundraising expenses listed as "salary"

They only have to list people paid more than $5k. If you have 10 people that you paid $2.6k then this is fine.

8) Feminist Frequency loaned $14,227 to someone in 2014 (Part X Item 22). However, in Schedule L Part II Anita Sarkeesian is listed as having loaned the $14,227 to Feminist Frequency in 2014. Which one is it? And why would Anita Sarkeesian need to loan more than 14,000 dollars to an organization that is sitting on more than $300,000? The question remains open, was Anita Sarkeesian the giver or the recipient of the loan?

This was filled out correctly. She was the giver.

Its listed under liabilities, so it's actually a negative amount. FF owes Anita $14,227

9) In Part XII Feminist Frequency states their financial statements were reviewed by an independent accountant. However, in the next item they state their financial statements were not audited by an independent accountant.

Reviewed and audited are two different things. Reviewed means it was proof-read. Audited means it was fact-checked.

10) Feminist Frequency checked Yes to Part IV item 18: "Did the organization report more than $15,000 total of fundraising event gross income and contributions on Part VIII, lines 1c and 8a? If "Yes, " complete Schedule G, Part II " However Schedule G Part II is blank. Which one is it? Did they raise more than $15,000 at a fundraising event or not? This might just be a mistake on their part. However it is emblematic of the sloppiness of this report.

They appear to have made a mistake here. They should have listed the kickstarter and whatever else in schedule G.

Conclusion:

Anita is paying herself around $6/hr. As an officer I'm 99% sure that it's legal to pay yourself under minimum wage, but that's usually a small red flag.

A few small mistakes, nothing that will get them audited.

Hope this helps.

0
1

[–] Mr_Sir 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Reviewed and audited are two different things. Reviewed means it was proof-read. Audited means it was fact-checked.

Beat me to it.

To add a little more info: Audits provide reasonable assurance that financial statements and disclosures are accurate and reliable (i.e not misleading, or falsified). Reviews provide limited assurance that material modifications do not need to be made to the financials or disclosures.

0
4

[–] NikoMyshkin 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

wait, so it Sarki committing fraud??? please say yes. I would LOVE to see this disgraceful person behind bars

0
3

[–] 6double5321 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

look into it. The freedom of information act is a wonderful thing. :o)

0
4

[–] I_like_paint 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Nice detective work

0
50

[–] cyks 0 points 50 points (+50|-0) ago 

Who is this hooker and why is she wearing clothes if she needs money?

0
3

[–] barset 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That's that shit right here that some of them bitch about, but if they want to make a quick buck dropping the top is a fast way to do so.

0
40

[–] NorBdelta 0 points 40 points (+40|-0) ago 

Cough cough, I need more money for my vastly over funded and years late on delivery kickstarter...

0
18

[–] idle_voating 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Not to mention the abundance of paid speaking arrangements she's had since then.

0
13

[–] squiremarcus 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

she stole half a million from feminists and wasted it. mission accomplished?

0
5

[–] barset 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

She's ready for Congress or the VP of the US with those kind of credentials.

0
33

[–] Blackrose 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

As a fellow ovarian challenged chick myself I want to throw my $0.02 worth.

WTF is wrong with you you silly fucken tart! Back up all your word shit up on to an external hard driver or a USB drive. Cheap as . There are ones that actually come in gig sizes now so all your data can comfortably sit on it. Buy a tablet. Buy a smart phone. throw your data on to a drop box or cloud sharing device. Buy a low end Dell laptop and use your old PC as a trade in for it - it will cost a truck ton cheaper and you can lay-by that shit if you are a nice responsible adult and make fucking repayments. Hell it may do wonders for your credit.

This begging helpless bullshit is just that - bullshit. It has nothing to do with feminism.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] Blackrose 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thanks - I just don't get this shit anymore. This learned helplessness shit drive me fucking insane. Who the fuck is Feminist Frequency group?

0
24

[–] boldfilter 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

1
15

[–] Ohooh 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Oh boy, I love how almost every reply is ripping her asshole in half.

0
5

[–] TheTrigger 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Except for that one idiot who keeps giving her money. Highly doubt he's actually making it rain, though.

Probably thinks he's pissing off the trolls, when he's actually supplying more keks than anything else.

0
14

[–] Samchay6 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

100% lying Swampdonkey bullshit - just like Feminist Frequency

0
13

[–] dannyduchamp 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

My god. She officially has no shame.

load more comments ▼ (34 remaining)