You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] acratus 6 points -2 points (+4|-6) ago 

Of course it does. Why don't the Amish have to pay taxes? Even the left-wing cooks at the ADL recognize the right to religious accommodation:

Requested accommodations vary - an employee may need a particular day off each year for a religious holiday; or to refrain from work every week on his or her Sabbath; or to wear religious garb; or to have a place to pray. An employer must try to arrange to allow the employee to meet these religious obligations. Examples of possible accommodations may include shift swaps between employees, voluntary assignment substitutions, flexible scheduling (allowing an employee to work on Sundays, Christmas or other national holiday in place of the day he or she needs off), lateral transfers to other positions in the company, and use of lunch time in exchange for early departure. An employer could allow an employee who is a Friday-night Sabbath observer to work longer hours on Monday through Thursday to enable the employee to leave early on Friday to be home for the Sabbath. An employer may require an employee to use paid time off, such as personal or vacation days, to meet an employee's required accommodation.


[–] Astromachine 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 


[–] acratus 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

From your link:

Amish also consider programs such as Social Security to be insurance programs, which contradict Amish beliefs against participating in commercial insurance.

While I may have been mistaken about the federal/income taxes, it shows that the Amish do get exceptions to the laws based on their religious beliefs.

And the "undue hardship" exceptions are specifically aimed at employers, not the state (and as I've already said, I have many disagreements with the ADL).

Also, I never brought up Title VII. A more pertinent law is Kentucky's RFRA: