You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
15

[–] Guy_Justsome 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

I'd say she's entitled to all of the winnings, because (1) she would have been SOL if he had lost the bet - all or nothing baby, and (2) the thief is entitled to none of what he stole - law cannot reward crime.

0
7

[–] prairie 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

She would also be entitled to damages on top of that, otherwise people could steal with no downside risk: either they get away with it or they just have to give it back.

0
1

[–] Dambuster 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

And.... he has to give her oral.

0
0

[–] NiggadermCQ ago 

Eww would rather pay double.

0
0

[–] european ago 

Half would be plenty