Archived I'll take "problems that solve themselves" for 500, Alex. (Source in comments) (files.catbox.moe)
submitted ago by [deleted]
Posted by: [deleted]
Posting time: 1.3 years ago on
Last edit time: 1.3 years ago on
Archived on: 11/24/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 399
SCP: 164
164 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Archived I'll take "problems that solve themselves" for 500, Alex. (Source in comments) (files.catbox.moe)
submitted ago by [deleted]
view the rest of the comments →
[–] bbqchipz 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Do you need laws to be a decent person? If honest to god anarchy happened it could be peaceful too. You don't need laws and rules to be a decent person. The definition of Anarchy is to be without Laws or an established order. It says nothing about chaos.
[–] Neon_Scrotum 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's basically true that good, kind, decent people don't need laws to make them be that way, but no group of people is ever entirely composed of good people. There are always bad people and even truly evil people. Laws are a means, however flawed, of protecting good people from bad people. Without laws, in a state of anarchy, the only thing protecting good people from bad people are guns, i.e. the willingness to do violence. The problem with that is that bad people have guns too, and are a lot more willing to do violence than good people. And once you get enough people willing to do violence, things just get very precarious. Having an idealistic outlook does not prevent bullets from killing you. Your rosy view of the state of anarchy won't mean shit to some low-I.Q. uneducated thug with a .45 pointed at your head and nothing preventing him from pulling the trigger except your hopeful belief in his good nature.
[–] bbqchipz ago
My Rosy view of state anarchy allows me to take room temperature iq people out of the gene pool and make them pay for their actions immediately instead of relying on some justice system. It's got advantages too.
[–] Fetalpig ago
Yes,yes you do. My neighbor would steal my shit in an instant. The only thing that is keeping him decent is my ammo,he is perfectly aware of my aim,and my conviction to keep my items mine.
[–] fishmantis ago (edited ago)
Most neighbors are able to cooperate with people that are similar to themselves, if only for mutual benefit. It's tribes that fight each other.
Dunno where you live but it sounds shitty if you can't even trust your own neighbors.
[–] Grospoliner ago
Are niggers decent people? The answer is no and you're fucking retarded for even entertaining the notion that anarchy is anything but violent.
[–] Adminstrater ago
We create restrictions by nature. Actions having consequences is a learned behavior. We don't need to live in a society, but it makes for better odds of collective survival if there is order instead of anarchy.
What does one gain to be a decent person?
Why would people want to survive as a collective instead of an individual?