When you feel like you need a break :)
This subverse is a dwelling place where all the funny things reside.
1.Tag NSFW material in your title.
2.No clickbait sites. (If the image is from a clickbait site, please use the image address instead of the original web address.)
Guidelines-
we are not looking to define speech and then remove content that contains that speech. In this spirit we will remove spam, illegal material, personal information and nothing else. Leaving it to the community to cast their voat and decide what they want to about your content! happy posting
If it makes you laugh - share it here, just don''t be a dingus! We're all here to have a good time.
Also check out some other knee-slapping subverses!
/v/comedy
/v/jokes
/v/JobStories
view the rest of the comments →
[–] derenotrat ago
@Blood-is-Nature is not entirely wrong. "White" is a label that makes it easier for people to attack all Europeans and blanket them under the same "guilt", it's an identity that their enemies can define and redefine with whatever anti-white rhetoric they can come up with. Greeks never enslaved Africans and were victims of Islam, but when put under the blanket of "whiteness" they can be accused of "white privilege" and attacked all the same. I've seen niggers on Twitter attack a Sicilian as having white privilege when she brought up that her people never did anything to enslave Africans or benefit from "white privilege" (the largest lynching in United States history was done to Italians).
Same with people like Croatians, Czechs, and even the Irish. They never did shit to Africans, Muslims, or "Native Americans", but under the label of "white people" and "whiteness", anyone with those ethnic backgrounds is guilty simply because they're typically lighter than a brown paper bag and an ethnicity of Europe. It makes it easier to discredit and downplay the atrocities Europeans have endured, and place guilt upon them all for what other Europeans, completely unrelated to them, may or may not have done. And because the factions have now been redefined further as "white people" and "POC", it furthers the isolation of "whites" as the scapegoat for all the problems, and helps ignore the atrocities many groups under the "POC" umbrella have committed against each other and Europeans.
Why do you think the niggers are going after "the myth of Irish slavery" so hard? The Irish are a group who got fucked in the same way just as bad (and worse in many cases, because they had no set economic value, nor restrictions on their importation and treatment, so their lives were actually worth much less than an African slave) but who as a people, didn't do anything to anyone under the POC umbrella. This is why ethnic Irish people can still be demonised because of "white privilege", but niggers can explain away African's involvement in African slavery by saying 'our system of slavery wasn't as bad as chattel slavery!'.
So essentially, 'You being "white-passing" makes you guilty of having privilege and benefiting from the things built because of the enslavement and oppression of my people even though your people had nothing to do with it, but we're not responsible for slavery because the system white people had was very different from the system in Africa! Please continue disregarding the fact that we still had an economic system in place based on the capture, selling, and purchase of other human beings to be used to enrich and benefit individuals and the government!'.
"Whites" must be responsible for any and all "white people" past, present, and future, but with "people of colour" it's a different set of standards, and as long as "white people" did it "worse", then their own crimes somehow don't count at all. Shit like this is why niggers can celebrate Mansa Musa for being the richest person in all of recorded history because 'he black', but ignore the fact that he aggressively expanded the Mali empire over three times its size from the time he took the throne, had an economy that relied heavily on the slave trade because of his empire's location (including African slaves and European slaves too) and contributed to the spread of Islam to those in Africa he conquered whether they wanted it or not.
More contemporary, look at people like Jacob Zuma who, while president of South Africa, openly sang the song "Shoot the Boer" on multiple occasions at political rallies, or Julius Malema who said, "...We are not calling for the slaughter of White people - at least for now. What we are calling for is for peaceful occupation of the lands, and we don't owe anyone an apology." Could you imagine the international outrage if shit like that was done by a "white person" anywhere in the United States, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand? But it wasn't, so they're "justified" and "things are different" in their situation.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago (edited ago)
I totally agree with the rest you said, but this here is as close as you got to addressing the real cause of the problem in your whole text. Why do you specifically name Africans or bring Croatians, Czechs, and the Irish into your explanation, while not mentioning the so called jews? They are called shapeshifters for a reason, and that reason isn't fiction, it's for masquerading their crimes. Who started the transatlantic slave trade? The Portuguese did, well jews larping as Portuguese did.
When you say "to enrich and benefit individuals and the government" then you're talking about a government bought by jewish usury money, and individuals under the control of jewish bribes, blackmail or debt. None of these people enrich themselves, they are only allowed to participate in the fake wealth of fiat currency, which the jews can take from them at a moments notice, if their pets ever stop following orders. These people are not rich, they are mere slaves of their desires, forced to follow endless rules of submission containing degeneracy, crime, fundamentalist doctrines, human sacrifices, and self humiliation rituals. Money is just a token given to them, that they are using as a justification for their actions.
All of this is just a way more refined version of the slave doctrine the secret societies (all jew controlled) have unrolled onto humanity to control us by feeding and exploiting our vices (especially sexual), which in modern times took of during the French Revolution, but is also at the foundation of population control unleashed upon us with the abrahamic religions (also jews). And the latter is also not the origin of human mass control through lies and deception, because religions came after the control mechanisms of law enforcement, laws, leadership and ownership...one leading to another, with religion leading to materialism (but that's another topic).
So in short...don't leave information on the table without calling out jewish crimes. Bending down to the jewish oppression of truth prevented none of the ongoing horrors they are committing endlessly. They are responsible for the death of billions of humans all throughout human history, and their destructive force is growing exponentially until they are stopped by any means necessary.
[–] derenotrat ago (edited ago)
I probably should have replied to your very first post to be more clear, but my intention was more to illustrate how what you were saying about the "white" label was true, since it appeared @fuckingmockies missed the point of what you were saying. I used those groups just as some examples, because if anyone looks at their histories, one cannot really form any argument about how they were "oppressive" in any way. For example, there was hardly a time the Irish Isle was not being fucked with in its history, but modern SJWs somehow call the Irish "racist oppressors" because they place the Irish under the "white" label, a label they have the power to define.
I was referring to the leaders in Africa in history. People today will seriously excuse Africa's long history of slavery with the argument 'it wasn't the same because it wasn't as bad'. If slavery in all its forms is supposed to be bad, then this argument is fucking ridiculous, but it's used time and time again to single out "whites" & is virtually unopposed. It seems like the only people opposing it at the moment are African scholars, who just held a convention at the UN this year to discuss why there is a larger volume of studies & resources on the 300 years of European involvement in African slavery, compared to the 1700+ years of Middle Eastern involvement in African slavery. Schools in Africa apparently cover Africa's involvement in slavery extensively, & they're starting to question why the West primarily teaches about their own involvement & places all the blame on themselves.
You're absolutely correct, but someone has to understand a problem exists, before you can start to help them understand the source(s) of it. My intention was to illustrate how the problem you were addressing exists.
Edit: How anyone can see those groups as "oppressive" in the context of African enslavement & other hot button SJW grievances with "whites".