You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

3
-1

[–] Blood-is-Nature 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago  (edited ago)

You can never address the newest problems if you still can't grasp how they tricked you before. Identifying as white is a rhetorical suicide that gives jews all the benefits of exploiting you. If you accept that label you identify as a color, which makes you not only the butt of the joke for the rest of the world (just ask the yellows and the browns about it) and it also gives the jews the legal right to discriminate you to their hearts content, because you can't discriminate a color group that doesn't exist. But what about muh blacks? Same thing, but unlike you, the Africans were not designed for intelligence, which is why the fell so easily for the black identity, that the jews are exploiting every step of the way.

Next step; natural laws: "opposites must coexist". Black and white are natural opposites, which means accepting them as an identity puts you automatically into opposition with an entire race that believes it's a color group. That's never ending conflict based on a corrupted identity, just like the jews want it to be. And finally, just to prove to you how much of a fool they made you out to be...put your hand on a white sheet of paper and tell me that you're white. Colorblind is what you are and the jews are pissing themselves about it.

your takeaway is that acknowledging a difference between races as a whole is...dividing us?

No. White isn't a race, black isn't a race, yellow isn't a race, brown isn't a race, the colors of the rainbow are not a race. Is there a difference between Africans and Europeans? Absolutely, and acknowledging that doesn't divide us at all.

Boomer

Another jewish label to attack your own elderly. Fact is, they fucked up before, you're fucking up now. Stop with the blame game.

Traitor

Because I identify as a European and not as the color "white"?

0
5

[–] newfiestalkfunny 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

All this just to say "you should say European instead of white" despite the fact they mean the exact same thing? What a waste of everybody's time.

2
-1

[–] Blood-is-Nature 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

It is absolutely not the same. There would be legal ramifications for attacking Europeans in the press, not so with whites. Go put up signs saying "it's okay to be European" and watch the reactions. After that go to any black and ask him how much he hates Europeans and watch his reaction. In any war rhetoric is the instigating weapon that strikes the hardest hits, long before any violence occurs. Stop underestimating their deceptions.

0
4

[–] 20211578? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Yep, you're confirmed retarded. Everyone knows when people say white they mean ethnically European, and you just flew off on a rant about what everyone else takes for granted. Put my hand next to a piece of paper lol wtf?

White people should have white ethnostates, end of story. If you place individual merits above racial well-being, then you're the one who fell for Jew tricks because Civic Nationalism is their invention.

0
0

[–] derenotrat ago 

@Blood-is-Nature is not entirely wrong. "White" is a label that makes it easier for people to attack all Europeans and blanket them under the same "guilt", it's an identity that their enemies can define and redefine with whatever anti-white rhetoric they can come up with. Greeks never enslaved Africans and were victims of Islam, but when put under the blanket of "whiteness" they can be accused of "white privilege" and attacked all the same. I've seen niggers on Twitter attack a Sicilian as having white privilege when she brought up that her people never did anything to enslave Africans or benefit from "white privilege" (the largest lynching in United States history was done to Italians).

Same with people like Croatians, Czechs, and even the Irish. They never did shit to Africans, Muslims, or "Native Americans", but under the label of "white people" and "whiteness", anyone with those ethnic backgrounds is guilty simply because they're typically lighter than a brown paper bag and an ethnicity of Europe. It makes it easier to discredit and downplay the atrocities Europeans have endured, and place guilt upon them all for what other Europeans, completely unrelated to them, may or may not have done. And because the factions have now been redefined further as "white people" and "POC", it furthers the isolation of "whites" as the scapegoat for all the problems, and helps ignore the atrocities many groups under the "POC" umbrella have committed against each other and Europeans.

Why do you think the niggers are going after "the myth of Irish slavery" so hard? The Irish are a group who got fucked in the same way just as bad (and worse in many cases, because they had no set economic value, nor restrictions on their importation and treatment, so their lives were actually worth much less than an African slave) but who as a people, didn't do anything to anyone under the POC umbrella. This is why ethnic Irish people can still be demonised because of "white privilege", but niggers can explain away African's involvement in African slavery by saying 'our system of slavery wasn't as bad as chattel slavery!'.

So essentially, 'You being "white-passing" makes you guilty of having privilege and benefiting from the things built because of the enslavement and oppression of my people even though your people had nothing to do with it, but we're not responsible for slavery because the system white people had was very different from the system in Africa! Please continue disregarding the fact that we still had an economic system in place based on the capture, selling, and purchase of other human beings to be used to enrich and benefit individuals and the government!'.

"Whites" must be responsible for any and all "white people" past, present, and future, but with "people of colour" it's a different set of standards, and as long as "white people" did it "worse", then their own crimes somehow don't count at all. Shit like this is why niggers can celebrate Mansa Musa for being the richest person in all of recorded history because 'he black', but ignore the fact that he aggressively expanded the Mali empire over three times its size from the time he took the throne, had an economy that relied heavily on the slave trade because of his empire's location (including African slaves and European slaves too) and contributed to the spread of Islam to those in Africa he conquered whether they wanted it or not.

More contemporary, look at people like Jacob Zuma who, while president of South Africa, openly sang the song "Shoot the Boer" on multiple occasions at political rallies, or Julius Malema who said, "...We are not calling for the slaughter of White people - at least for now. What we are calling for is for peaceful occupation of the lands, and we don't owe anyone an apology." Could you imagine the international outrage if shit like that was done by a "white person" anywhere in the United States, Europe, Australia, or New Zealand? But it wasn't, so they're "justified" and "things are different" in their situation.