You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] oddjob 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

First off, how can you believe that any machine can detect pedophiles, much less a hand-held one? Does he also believe there are machines that can detect people's sexuality?

Second, how much support can an Alabama Supreme Court Justice actually give to a foreign country?


[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I seriously doubt they gave him any warning of what they were about to do. If they'd told him in advance "we're going to imply you're a sexual predator" he obviously wouldn't have scheduled the interview.


[–] Wargasm 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Lots of people believe that a machine can detect sexuality. Here is a draft of a paper for a machine that was able to do just that:


[–] CrudOMatic 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

mfw the left are STILL trying to claim that relations between a 16y/o and an adult are PEDOphilic (pedophilia is the attraction to PRE-PUBESCENT children - a 16y/o is NOT prepubescent) - while at the same time wanting to lower the age of consent to 16.

So I guess the left are trying to legalize pederasty then? I mean, they're saying sex with a 16 y/o is PEDOphilic.