1
80

[–] curomo 1 points 80 points (+81|-1) ago 

That'snothowanyofthisworks.gif

0
20

[–] fusir 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Who are you to say someone can't have a baby just because that is the physical reality?

0
5

[–] Homelessfuck 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

What do you mean cutting off my testicles won't give me a uterus?

0
4

[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

24
-21

1
36

[–] BAAC 1 points 36 points (+37|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Stan: I want to have babies.

Reg: You want to have babies?!?!

Stan: It's every man's right to have babies if he wants them.

Reg: But ... you can't HAVE babies!

Stan: Don't you oppress me!

Reg: I'm not oppressing you, Stan. You haven't got a womb! Where's the fetus gonna gestate? You gonna keep it in a box?

0
12

[–] LewsTherinTelamon 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

It's unfortunate that Life of Brian probably wouldn't be able to be made today. Too many jokes that would have been "offensive".

0
6

[–] BAAC 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Was just thinking that today when I heard Netflix had picked up the Python catalog... Wonder how badly they will cut it up?

0
0

[–] irelandLost 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Life of Brian was banned in my country till the 90s cos it was blasphemous. Just a new motivation behind censorship these days, similar effect though. Plus ca change...

0
0

[–] Wahaha 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

They were offensive back then, too. The makers just didn't give a shit. It even was banned in lots of places upon release.

0
2

[–] floss_1 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Reg: What's the point of fighting for his right to have babies when he can't have babies?!

Francis: (thinks) It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression!

Reg: Symbolic of his struggle against reality...

I love that movie.

0
1

[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

2
1

[–] BlueDrache 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

You realize a male human can gestate a fetus ... if it's surgically implanted ...

Meaning ... it's not natural ... and therefor as much an abomination as the homosexuals are.

1
2

[–] GoatEmperorTrump 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Only valid response:

Kill it with fire. Kill its sperm with fire. Gas myself for having to even know this exists on my planet.

1
1

[–] glennvtx 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Never been done, probably wont.

0
0

[–] Schreiber 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You got downvoated by a faggot lmao.

I swear there's way too many faggots on voat thinking that their opinion matters.

Remember that faggots are concentration camp material as well. LGBTs are never welcome here.

1
14

[–] Morbo 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Just goes to show that they're not only mental but stupid too.

0
2

[–] prairie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wait, you're telling me that a sex reassignment surgery doesn't make someone a fully-functioning fertile member of the other sex?

0
1

[–] Morbo 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The surgery alone isn't enough to do it. You have to get your gametes to identify as the opposite type so sperm can become he-eggs or eggs can become shperm.

0
0

[–] Schreiber 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Gotta change the steps in the "sex reassignment surgery."

I propose: step 1, use a gun and shoot a bullet into the patient's head.

0
1

[–] xenoPsychologist 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

would have been a golden opportunity to quote the namesake.

0
3

[–] Pulverizor 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

PATHETIC HUMAN!

0
3

[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Reminds me of a Dean Koontz novel.

0
3

[–] VoutGuy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Still need eggs, no?

0
12

[–] forgot_p4ssword 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

wait.. you can't get pregnart by peeing in the butt?

The wife got some explainin' to do when she comes home from the coalburn factory.

0
5

[–] L3D 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

And a womb. Technology isn't that far yet. More like the sperm will be used on a woman.

0
1

[–] rndmvar 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

http://time.com/5044565/exclusive-first-u-s-baby-born-after-a-uterus-transplant/

It's not that far fetched. Fucked up, but if they can transplant another woman's womb into some stranger woman. Then, I don't know if there's much left preventing a man from getting such a procedure. Then you end up with some baby who's fucked up for life because of all the hormones that the man with the womb transplant was taking.

Someone will eventually play God, and we'll get a real life tabloid monstrosity.

0
2

[–] AilsaCraig 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

How would 'she' and her partner (assuming that's a 'he') have kids together? Sperm and sperm don't go together.

Best they could do is buy a lot of the same woman's eggs and get surrogates to gestate eggs fertilized by both guys. That way they kids would be half siblings through the mother.

0
2

[–] looking4truth 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Why wont god flood the earth like the good old days.

0
1

[–] CeasarSalud 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I'll be the kikefaggot today, but I think this abomination means the sperm is being saves to put into a real woman after it gets castrated, kinda like when some of your boys go on ice if one wants a vasectomy.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)