You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Camulos 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The article is purposely written to confuse.

Nobody likes these mudslime goat fuckers but to promote complete bullshit like this is stupid at best. The article by it's own admission places the carbon dating of these Koran fragments between 586 and 645AD. A process by it's very nature is "educated conjecture" at best. Sorry but carbon dating while is an amazing technology that let's us shoot a good guess, it's by no means accurate at all. While the baby fucker Mohammad did his baby fucking approx between the years 570-632 (which were the supposed years that he was born and died) those dates as you or anyone able to rub two brain cells together can easily see that those dates coincide directly with the carbon dated guess.

It's all well and good shitting on primitive arab goat fuckers but at least shit on them with the truth, it's far easier that way than presenting bullshit articles.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Camulos ago 

I dunno what you're going on about. The baby fucker Muhammad came from a wealthy (((merchant))) family and he was most certainly not illiterate, nor were his sons who were murdered by their fathers own followers but that's another story. I have no doubt the Koran and it's origin is dubious at best, in fact I believe wholeheartedly that it is a manufactured jewish trick to combat Christianity... but the dates that the article gives to suggest some kind of fuckery is afoot simply due to the carbon dating just doesn't make any kind of sense.