0
40

[–] TheodoreKent 0 points 40 points (+40|-0) ago 

Fucking brilliant. We need a kickstarter.

0
20

[–] BakedMofoBread 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Make sure not to buy koorahns, have them printed by one of /ourCompanies/.

Don't let them profit off of this scheme.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] BIGLY17 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Shit I'd fund this.

0
24

[–] Laurentius_the_pyro 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

last line should have been

>MUSLIM EXPLODES

0
4

[–] BeHereNow 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Tomato tomahto

1
13

[–] Helios-Apollo 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

Or we could just shoot them and drive them from Constantinople.

1
2

[–] WeekendBaker 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Given that we are importing them... I don't think there is a big enough concern yet to retake Christian lands. Wimpy new age peace and tolerance controls the money for now.

0
12

[–] Octoclops 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

They actually had a similar problem with a copy of the Koran that Saddam had made with his own blood as ink which is apparently against the rules so they've got to destroy it but of course they can't. I forget what they ended up doing.

0
6

[–] cthulian_axioms 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

his own blood as ink which is apparently against the rules

I can understand why. That's on some Necronomicon shit. Were the pages made of vellum derived from humans?

0
5

[–] Hlatbern 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Buried it in the desert I think. Time and weather destroying one is apparently fine.

0
2

[–] L3D 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It has its own wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_Quran it does not say what has been done to it, just "removed from public display" so it exists still most likely.

0
0

[–] Reed_Solomon 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

They'll just come up with a lame ass excuse to temporarily justify it. Like, the house caught fire, the book burned accidentally as a result.

0
11

[–] StoneRights 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They can ignore their own laws if it's for supporting their religion against the infidels.

0
5

[–] BentAxel 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Having pictures of Muoohammed is not allowed? How what the fuck is that?

0
7

[–] Devieus 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

The real answer is that depictions of the prophet would distract from the worship of god. This extends to any number of icons depending on which sect of islam, which is why those idiots destroyed ancient stuff and wouldn't mind destroying the black cube; it's also why mosques are filled with geometrical shapes, because math is considered a divine thing.

They're also not very smart, the lot of them.

0
4

[–] RevoltNow 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's connected to the whole "graven images" thing, you know, one of the ten commandments? Christians (and as far as I'm aware, Jews) don't worry too much about that one, but as usual Islam took a much more extreme position.

0
4

[–] ExpertShitposter [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Because muslims.

4
-4

0
1

[–] UglyTruth 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The prohibition against images of people is from the Hadith, which has a long history of being wrong about things (eg that Mohammed was a paedophile).

There are quite a few early Islamic drawing of Mohammed:

http://zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full/

0
5

[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Nuke

0
4

[–] novictim 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Ya, actually, the Caliph Uthman ordered the destruction of every Koran not officially created by his own scholars. So this is not the solution as the modification of the Koran with the image will just de-legitimize it.

So destroying Mecca and the black stone/Kaaba is still the best way. Make it a radioactive death zone so that no one can commit the Hajj. That contradiction will wreak havoc on the claims of power and legitimacy.

Meanwhile, force the Western public to read the Koran. That is the best refutation of this cult.

1
0

[–] UglyTruth 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Meanwhile, force the Western public to read the Koran. That is the best refutation of this cult.

Indeed, Allah orders justice and good conduct and giving to relatives and forbids immorality and bad conduct and oppression. He admonishes you that perhaps you will be reminded.

Surah 16:90

0
3

[–] MaxDemian 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

“Kill them [unbelievers] wherever you find them… And fight them until there is no more unbelief and worship is for Allah alone” (Quran 2:191-193).

“Strike off their heads and strike from them every fingertip” (Quran 8:12).

“Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties; in exchange for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they slay and are slain” (Quran 9:111).

“Truly Allah loves those who fight in His cause in battle array…” (Quran 61:4)

“The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah” (Sahih Muslim 1:33).

I could easily keep going and pull more hate from the Koran, but what is the point? You are obviously shilling or trolling.

0
0

[–] novictim 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

There is a lot there to unpack. I would just note the word-game Islam uses:

Oppression = Not Following Islam.

Peace = Living under Sharia whether you like it or not.

Justice = different laws/rules for Muslims vs NonMuslims (there is not equality under the law in Sharia).

This technique of deception is called Touriya, where words carry a different meaning for Muslims than is expected from NonMuslims.

Other deceptions include outright lies like Taqiyya and then other forms such as Kitman (lies by ommission), Muruna (specific to Sharia where Sharia's nasty bits are not discussed with kafirs). So here you have a religion that actually has to create new names for various types of lies? Yep.

The great news is that one simple reading of the accurately translated Koran's first Suras makes all that I just said clear as a bright, sunny day in hell.

This is why Mohammad's attempt to create his new Nabatean religion was a failure for his decade of attempts in "Mecca" (of course, we know that Mohammad could never have lived in Mecca, right? Mecca is not a city until the mid 8th century hence archaeology is banned in Mecca). His message and plagiarisms were shit and his audience mocked him as the man who copies everything he hears. Only when Mohammad turns to violence and allies with bandit gangs of Arabs does he achieve success. Mohammad's cult has nothing compelling to offer except to degenerates.

Surah 16:101->" they say to Mohammad "you are and imposter!"..."A mortal man taught him." But the man(scholar) to whom they allude speaks a foreign tongue, while this is eloquent Arabic speech!"

Read that idiocy again and again. This is what passes for sound logic and argument in the Low IQ Arab world that birthed Mohammad or whatever his name was. Think about it. Because Mohammad translated parables he had heard from actual wise and learned traders and travelers into Arabic then Mohammad could not be guilty of PLAGIARISM. Does that make you feel like Mohammad and his sheep fucker-people have inherited the gift of sound reasoning?

Boil Islam down to its solid essence and in so doing you will boil off good ideas and rational thought to be left only with this black nugget: violence as its own justification.

load more comments ▼ (20 remaining)