When you feel like you need a break :)
This subverse is a dwelling place where all the funny things reside.
1.Tag NSFW material in your title.
2.No clickbait sites. (If the image is from a clickbait site, please use the image address instead of the original web address.)
Guidelines-
we are not looking to define speech and then remove content that contains that speech. In this spirit we will remove spam, illegal material, personal information and nothing else. Leaving it to the community to cast their voat and decide what they want to about your content! happy posting
If it makes you laugh - share it here, just don''t be a dingus! We're all here to have a good time.
Also check out some other knee-slapping subverses!
/v/comedy
/v/jokes
/v/JobStories
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Charlez6 ago
Sure, but individuals have the right to be aberrations. They are not harming others. Nobody is being involved against their will.
How is it a crime?
What if someone arbitrarily decided that some lifestyle choice of yours is an "aberration" by their standards. Is it a crime then, because they said so? Do you agree you should be locked up and owe compensation to your victims?
[–] cynicaloldfart ago
Fuck their arbitrary standards based on their feelings. I said they are a statistical, scientific aberration. Undeniable, not my emotional opinion.
Oh shit, victimhood and reparations? You're new at this, aren't you? Your idealistic notions will only make you a victim. And nobody is going to pay for your support. Put on some big boy pants, earn your own way, and learn to make decisions based on history, reality, and empirical evidence.
[–] Charlez6 ago
That could be said of yours as well.
But do people not have the right to be aberrations? Even if that's true, it's not a justification for persecuting them. They haven't committed a crime; they've done nothing wrong. They may not be virtuous, productive people, but they've never harmed anyone.
And I'm not sure where you were going with that last part... Victims deserving compensation is not an immature or idealistic delusion. If someone punches you in the face without consent, they've committed a crime and owe you a debt. It's a simple and fundamental concept in justice. So my point was, in the context of homosexuality, who is the victim? If Bob and Bill blow each other then who has committed a crime (and what is it)? Who is the victim there?