You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Charlez6 ago 

Sure, but individuals have the right to be aberrations. They are not harming others. Nobody is being involved against their will.

How is it a crime?

What if someone arbitrarily decided that some lifestyle choice of yours is an "aberration" by their standards. Is it a crime then, because they said so? Do you agree you should be locked up and owe compensation to your victims?

0
0

[–] cynicaloldfart ago 

What if someone arbitrarily decided that some lifestyle choice of yours is an "aberration" by their standards.

Fuck their arbitrary standards based on their feelings. I said they are a statistical, scientific aberration. Undeniable, not my emotional opinion.

owe compensation to your victims?

Oh shit, victimhood and reparations? You're new at this, aren't you? Your idealistic notions will only make you a victim. And nobody is going to pay for your support. Put on some big boy pants, earn your own way, and learn to make decisions based on history, reality, and empirical evidence.

0
0

[–] Charlez6 ago 

Fuck their arbitrary standards based on their feelings.

That could be said of yours as well.

I said they are a statistical, scientific aberration. Undeniable, not my emotional opinion.

But do people not have the right to be aberrations? Even if that's true, it's not a justification for persecuting them. They haven't committed a crime; they've done nothing wrong. They may not be virtuous, productive people, but they've never harmed anyone.

And I'm not sure where you were going with that last part... Victims deserving compensation is not an immature or idealistic delusion. If someone punches you in the face without consent, they've committed a crime and owe you a debt. It's a simple and fundamental concept in justice. So my point was, in the context of homosexuality, who is the victim? If Bob and Bill blow each other then who has committed a crime (and what is it)? Who is the victim there?