You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

9
1

[–] Charlez6 9 points 1 point (+10|-9) ago  (edited ago)

Homosexuality has no victims, it's not a crime in the moral sense of the word. Your examples are clearly violations of the rights of others.

You can think it's disgusting, stupid, degenerate, etc., but I'm yet to hear a valid argument for it being a wrong.

2
9

[–] library_of_stupid 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago 

I'm yet to hear a valid argument for it being a wrong

It's enabling the mentally ill. And if you don't view their promiscuous, pederast lifestyles as wrong then I don't know what the fuck you're high on.

Tolerance is not a virtue in and of itself. You're not a better person for tolerating and enabling every kind of filth with the weak excuse of "it doesn't hurt anyone" (when it's blatantly obvious it does).

0
0

[–] Charlez6 ago 

if you don't view their promiscuous, pederast lifestyles as wrong then I don't know what the fuck you're high on

Not an argument.

People have the right to be promiscuous. It's their body, they can do whatever they like with it so long as they're not harming others against their will.

It's not about tolerance, it's about principles.

3
0

[–] Bridgeheadprod 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

Most gay people, like most people in general, are not pederasts. Show me a study saying otherwise. Your only other point that you use to back up your "mentally Ill" claim is that they're promiscuous. Are you mad someone is getting laid more than you? You say it's a "wrong" lifestyle. Is that what your mother described it as when she was raising you? Serious question. I see some sexual repression issues with you.

0
5

[–] cynicaloldfart 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It is not conducive to western society cohesion. It is an aberration.

3
3

[–] FuckYouReddit- 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago 

If they don't try to shove their gayness on others I could give a fuck what they do in their own bed.

Besides, two gay guys = two less guys to compete against for all da bitchez

0
1

[–] prairie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What's the solution?

0
0

[–] Charlez6 ago 

Sure, but individuals have the right to be aberrations. They are not harming others. Nobody is being involved against their will.

How is it a crime?

What if someone arbitrarily decided that some lifestyle choice of yours is an "aberration" by their standards. Is it a crime then, because they said so? Do you agree you should be locked up and owe compensation to your victims?

0
1

[–] PonchoKitty 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What about drug abuse? Is that still wrong?

Inb4 someone says drugs can lead you to hurt others

0
0

[–] Charlez6 ago 

Of course not. It's your body, your life, you can abuse drugs all you like. No victim, no crime.

0
0

[–] unclejimbo ago 

Well it's essentially nature saying you don't get to pass your genes on without outright killing you. It is nature confirming inferior status within the species as a whole.

0
0

[–] Charlez6 ago 

Right, but that's not an argument for the immorality of it. Nobody is being harmed, nobody is being included against their will, there is no victim. There is no crime.