[–] [deleted] 0 points 60 points (+60|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] ihaveabulldoge 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

At least ISIS isn't fat

5
2

[–] caffeine_pills- 5 points 2 points (+7|-5) ago 

Voat's new censorship

Downvoating is what reddit uses to silence dissenting views.

People don't typically upvoat, even if they like something. They will just look at it.

But when people get butthurt or see things they don't like they DO DOWNVOAT. You're assuming that people use both buttons the same way.

Voating is a censorship tool because it doesn't depend on rational argumentation. It only depends on CONSENSUS. That's why SRS use downvoat brigades because they know it's only purpose is to censor content they don't want seen by others.

Look, our entire political system should make it more practical. We don't let everyone vote in elections for a good reason: we know that retards are the majority of people. You want Bill Gate's educated vote negated by some homeless retard on the street? That's EXACTLY what democratic voting does. That's exactly what the movie Idiocracy was about. When you give everyone an equal say, you negate the point of education. You negate the point of rational argumentation. If a baby can negate the vote of an adult, then you don't really need to learn how to think. All you need to do is make people agree with you. And bribery is the fastest way to agreement.

Since people tend to downvoat when they're butthurt and engaged in censorship, the best way to combat censorship would be to only allow UPVOATING since people will actively have to champion what they believe rather than focus on what they want to complain about and censor. You can look at upvoating as positive censorship since it at least puts the burden on the upvoater to be accountable to their views and say what they prefer instead of simply complaining about what they don't want.

Stating what you want to happen takes EDUCATION AND EFFORT. Complaining about what you don't want just requires the ability to be butthurt.

I'd rather err on the side of positive censorship if we have to censor at all. We already know how negative censorship turns out: it becomes reddit.

At least positive censorship requires EFFORT that keyboard warriors aren't willing to invest. So if we want to make this place different from reddit, we should ONLY have an upvoat button.

0
1

[–] fleas 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Nah the Muslims have better beards. The sjw beards are patchy and look weird on their bulging necks. Also don't forget heigine is important in Islam

Thanks for pointing me here SVS you authoritarian goat lickers.

1
1

[–] FuckFatCunts 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

I was banned from /v/fatpeoplehate for hating niggers on another account so this website is exactly the same

0
3

[–] ihaveabulldoge 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Well...we like black people on that sub.

Just hate fatties pretty bad. I don't think anyone would give a shit if your history was all some Aryan nation stuff, but you came to just hate the fats. FPH has never been into the racism thing bro.

0
1

[–] durodur 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

well, It's not what the reddit vote is supposed to do.

1
1

[–] gramman74 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Do you know of a sub along those lines I am very interested!! ( in the peaceful religion of Islam /s)

19
4

[–] tankfull2doom 19 points 4 points (+23|-19) ago  (edited ago)

Voat's new censorship

Downvoating is what reddit uses to silence dissenting views.

People don't typically upvoat, even if they like something. They will just look at it.

But when people get butthurt or see things they don't like they DO DOWNVOAT. You're assuming that people use both buttons the same way.

Voating is a censorship tool because it doesn't depend on rational argumentation. It only depends on CONSENSUS. That's why SRS use downvoat brigades because they know it's only purpose is to censor content they don't want seen by others.

Look, our entire political system should make it more practical. We don't let everyone vote in elections for a good reason: we know that retards are the majority of people. You want Bill Gate's educated vote negated by some homeless retard on the street? That's EXACTLY what democratic voting does. That's exactly what the movie Idiocracy was about. When you give everyone an equal say, you negate the point of education. You negate the point of rational argumentation. If a baby can negate the vote of an adult, then you don't really need to learn how to think. All you need to do is make people agree with you. And bribery is the fastest way to agreement.

Since people tend to downvoat when they're butthurt and engaged in censorship, the best way to combat censorship would be to only allow UPVOATING since people will actively have to champion what they believe rather than focus on what they want to complain about and censor. You can look at upvoating as positive censorship since it at least puts the burden on the upvoater to be accountable to their views and say what they prefer instead of simply complaining about what they don't want.

Stating what you want to happen takes EDUCATION AND EFFORT. Complaining about what you don't want just requires the ability to be butthurt.

I'd rather err on the side of positive censorship if we have to censor at all. We already know how negative censorship turns out: it becomes reddit.

At least positive censorship requires EFFORT that keyboard warriors aren't willing to invest. So if we want to make this place different from reddit, we should ONLY have an upvoat button.

0
34

[–] velcropenis 0 points 34 points (+34|-0) ago 

That is the funniest thing I've seen all day. Thank you!

Nigger faggots..

[–] [deleted] 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

12
-8

0
0

[–] EdSnowden ago 

0
12

[–] gramman74 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

On second thought I had to give the guy his due. He put alot of work into that piece of art .GOOD JOB!!!

0
5

[–] distortedlines 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Those last few sentences are just poetic

0
1

[–] Apoplectic1 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Just the last few?

1
3

[–] Konstamokh 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

It's clearly exaggerating, but that's what humour is often doing. He/she put a lot of work in this and it's funny.

1
-1

[–] Warbear 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

It's clearly exaggerating

I don't see any exaggeration...

0
2

[–] sillymanilly 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I liked this and I usually hate poetry.

0
2

[–] Daz 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

OP is still a faggot. (4chan humor, I don't mean this seriously)

0
2

[–] Scotcheggs 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Ah that's just perfect. When you read reddit and see how arrogant the users are while they are stroking their neckbeards white knighting m'lady social justice causes I just feel embarrassed.

load more comments ▼ (19 remaining)