[–] [deleted] 4 points 68 points (+72|-4) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
18

[–] hotairmakespopcorn 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Sexual identity is almost exclusively a cultural/societal phenomenon.

The Kinsey scale allows for homosexuality. And in fact there has been some research of women which explains that bisexuality is in fact the norm and a genetic predisposition. It's believed this was because monogamy is a cultural creation whereas troops or harem are the natural state of things. This is also mirrored in the animal kingdom. Accordingly, to become the preferred breeding stock, as dictated by genetics, females who were more open were more sexually enticing and therefore more likely to be inseminated. Today, it's believed roughly 20% of women still have this pronounced genetic makeup. Which includes sexual excitment of watching their male rail another female (cuckqueen, iirc).

Today, socially, we frown upon one male collecting many females because it's socially harmful. It creates social unrest and in some cases, even wars; internal and external. Which is why so many are concerned about China's future and their military build up. Traditionally, when you're in short supply of women, you simply go steal (or rape and leave) them from other cultures.

Now the rest of this stuff, we also know is almost exclusively a cultural creation. It's my opinion that much of this other identify junk is identifying cultural disease which has allowed it to embrace mental disorders. Since it's good for identity politics, it's now in our faces.

As an interesting side note for context, it's worth pointing out, that contrary to what is taught in church, female bisexuality is absolutely not forbidden. The bible is fairly clear that so long as a women is willing to take a load from a man, it's not an issue. Which, of course, makes complete sense given that polygamy of the wealthy was normal and widely accepted. Furthermore, the bible is actually not against polygamy. It does, however, very strongly condemn male homosexuality. I offer this not to get into a biblical discussion, but to illistrate how culture has shaped current perceptions versus historical reality. Please don't' start with the, "bible is not historical". Because like it or not, it's a fact that it does capture societal norms and provide insight into some people of the time. One such example is provided here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale

0
13

[–] Neo-maxi-zoom-dweeby 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

I don't really care what the f*** people do with their dick or their pussy. I don't care if they want to be called a man woman girl boy whatever any of the f****** Pony Kens I don't care.

I just don't want that s*** in my face and I don't want somebody demanding I call them by some f***** up words that I can't barely pronounce. I really wish they would just keep their bizarre s*** to themselves and leave me in peace with it.

1
5

[–] larkan 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Sexual identity is almost exclusively a cultural/societal phenomenon.

No it fucking absolutely is NOT. Sexual identity is almost exclusively a BIOLOGICAL phenomenon, as demonstrated by literally every sexually-reproducing species on the planet (i.e., nearly all non-microscopic animals).

Males impregnate or fertilize the eggs of females, who then give birth. That's it. Any sexually-reproducing organisms which deviate from that norm tend to die out, and make up a very tiny percentage of any sexually-reproducing group.

Sure there are plenty of exceptions - exceptions which prove the rule.

1
0

[–] Blue333 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Kinsey was a flagrant deviant. I wouldn't believe shit he says. Do you know how those studies were conducted? Look into it. And read about the shit they did to babies. Kinsey is predominantly responsible for all this gender "fluidity" bullshit. Trying to redefine reality in order to suit the world to his and his friend's personal perversions. It's what most deviants do. They claim there's no right or wrong, no black or white, no male or female - only relativism. Well I'll tell you this, without male and female there can be no redefinition of the terms.

0
9

[–] Phuc_Dat_Bich 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

This is a super important point. If what the trans pimps are saying is actually true that means we must have a significant environmental pollution problem that should be addressed immediately.

0
9

[–] Aniabub 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I had someone in australia tell me there was no biological difference between men and women. For some reason she didnt take my million dollar bet to get my husband pregnant, stupid cunt.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] DalaiFarmer 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I thought it used to be male, female and tranny/weirdo.

[–] [deleted] 3 points 15 points (+18|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] mason 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It did used to be that way, and acceptance of homosexuality I think is a great thing, I think its good progress though I'm sure alt-righters completely disagree. But of course it seems like we cannot simply do this without swinging the pendulum waaaaaay further than that and start treating all LGBTQ whatevers like greater, more noble beings than everybody else. That's sort of the consequence of leftist virtue signalling and victimhood addiction.

0
3

[–] ConvictCrusader 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I prefer male, female and defect.

0
1

[–] The_Forgotten_Man 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I though male female tranny homo weirdo. That's all five right. Oh lets see what they fucking make up to cry about next.

0
3

[–] DrumpfBTFO 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

wait a second. Some lesbians are hot, according to stuff i watch on Pornhub.

But anyway, if transsexuals would be considered as some other gender, that should be it. There's no way that people should memorise the Tumblr-list

1
49

[–] SaveTheChildren 1 points 49 points (+50|-1) ago 

Took me a while to get this.

At first I was like, yeah, there's no regular men / women. And also there isn't an Appache Hel.... wait a minute, yes there is.

0
9

[–] 7882552 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

There's a man on the far right, although once again the straight woman is getting [insert phalic phrase here].

0
14

[–] Capt_Rye 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Of course the man is onthe far right. The left doesnt want anything to do with them except blame them

0
2

[–] julian_assanger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

hehe... insert...

0
1

[–] BlueDrache 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

her pussy grabbed?

6
-2

[–] SaveTheChildren 6 points -2 points (+4|-6) ago  (edited ago)

man gorilla

FTFY

Edit: (help, how do you strikeout on voat?) Speaking of... is there a good cheatsheet for typesetting syntax on voat? I've tried googling this a zillion times and never find anything.

1
3

[–] username-way-too-lon 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

That was seriously the best comment I've ever read on Voat. Thanks for giving me a good laugh this morning. :)

0
9

[–] cyks 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Here is the official link with the original cover art found near the bottom There is a male, but there is no female. It leaves any woman viewing the cover conflicted on how it can relate to herself.

0
24

[–] Sellyoulight 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

Why the fuck does NatGeo have to make a cover out of celebrating a group of specimens that make up such a stunningly small % of the overall population? And... to make it even fuzzier, the so-called “statistics” about these specimens revolve around how the specimens “identify”--which doesn’t necessarily track with what they actually physically are, but more about what they “feel” like they are on any given day. So--I guess any one person could have “Manly Man Monday” and follow it up with a “Girly Girl Tuesday” and then a “Genderqueer Pansexual Demiromantic Nonbinary Wednesday”. WTF? IMO this is all just one big bunch of really stupid horseshit.

0
4

[–] Behuvius 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

And why a backdrop of an Apache helicopter? We don't need any more of this gender confusion bullshit in the military.

0
9

[–] GoogleStoleMyBike 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Get outta here with your bigotry, heliphobe!

0
3

[–] Reconn 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

B-b-but how will people know how unique an individual I am if I don't come up with ridiculous and outlandish identities for myself?

I actually think all these extra titles do actual harm to people with legitimate problems. I know the notion isn't popular on Voat but I can see a legitimate argument for crossed wires in trans individuals from a biological sense (elevated/askew hormones during pregnancy/environmental contaminants/genetic flaws--not the men in their 50's having midlife crises). ie: male identifies as female, female identifies as male. But all these other ridiculous whimsy titles have probably done trans people real harm by making them look absolutely ridiculous by getting lumped in with bandwagon shit heads.

Intersex/hermaphrodites get totally boned either way though because they usually get born with partial sets of both types of equipment. That would be like getting dropped into a blender and then when you're poured out-- congratulations!!! You're just fucked!

Things will work out alright in the long-run though, designer babies are coming in the next century or two. Trans/intersex will have issues corrected before even being born, so they won't need to deal with that headache. Along with a string of hereditary genetic illnesses and down syndrome being eliminated as well.

1
14

[–] badbear 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

I find it strange that they also left out "Female".

0
4

[–] Bill_Murrays_Sandals [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The cis-scum who wrote the article probably has investments in the patriarchy and hates womyn of all genders

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] solar_flare 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

There's some truth to that:

Breeder: slang term used by people of homosexual persuasion to refer to heterosexual couples, who have a significantly higher risk of contributing to the population increase than the homosexuals do.

0
13

[–] Landrictree 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

As someone who grew up with National Geographic, this makes me sad.

Seems like everything educational is being gutted.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] pitenius 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

For when you're ready. They love it. The earlier episodes are best.

0
1

[–] glugglug 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Bad news for you: Sesame Street has been butchered by the PC police, even before the takeover by HBO. Very few places have any episodes from before the latest incarnation that started in 2011.

0
0

[–] pitenius 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Blame Rupert Murdoch.

2
13

[–] notArobott 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

Wow, of course the niggers get to be normal and the whites are all faggots. Just a coincidence, I'm sure!

0
5

[–] 7883319 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Take notice faggots. This is a prime example of a jew trick.

0
9

[–] GoatyMcGoatface 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Someday in the far future, when people aren't retarded, we'll use this as a study of how brain-damaged drug-addled fairy tales shaped the beginning of the 21st century

0
8

[–] vandilx 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

There are only two genders: male and female. Anything else is a mental problem.

There's a whole host of sexual orientations and lifestyle preferences -- No one gives a shit about who you want to have touching your junk or how you want to dress. That's your business.

0
2

[–] solar_flare 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There are only two genders: male and female.

Yup.

XY=male

XX=female

0
0

[–] ConvictCrusader 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Then you can have defects XXY, XXXY or Xy

load more comments ▼ (38 remaining)