You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] Crensch 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

No. "-centric" means I place something above something else. I don't.

Yeah, you place them above where they belong. You do.

Scientific advancement at a rate never before seen?

Kek. No. Women having the vote didn't do that. What an absurd claim.

Same as above.

Same as above.

The past was a shithole, you'll never convince me that the 19th century was better than the 21st.

I wouldn't even try. I'm saying giving them the vote contributed to the current downfall.

Not in your mind, just to the sane, rational people.

That ignore reality in favor of convenient lies.

It's obvious that some woman in your life has hurt you and you can't control your emotions towards women, so I mostly just feel sorry for you.

Kek. I can learn from other people's mistakes.

[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Crensch ago 

Ah, universal suffrage was responsible for all bad things that happened afterwards but none of the good things. Convenient!

As if voting somehow caused the technology boom of the private sector.

You CAN, however, blame Hillary's current chances squarely on the shoulders of women.

You've no interest in sources, no interest in rational discussion, no interest in historic facts. By your own words, you shouldn't have the right to vote.

Kek. I have plenty of interest in those things, but not with people like you, or subjects like police needing to be able to move other people out of harm's way.

I'm male. I produce more than I consume, which is the average for males, unlike females. If voting were based off of what you could give back, women would have no vote.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/roiw.12165/abstract

And if you can't read studies, or don't want to take that time, here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V6s92p42UM&feature=youtu.be