You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] Crensch 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

"I'll pretend not to care so I can keep talking out of my ass and never have to face the fact that my opinions might be wrong."

Take it how you like. I've based my opinions and ideas off of the information I've found. I'm just not invested enough in this line of discussion to care.

Also, if you don't already understand that women are incapable of doing what men do at the quality and level that men do those things, we really have nothing at all to discuss.

You win on the cops thing, because apparently cops don't get shot, and aren't supposed to carry their wounded out of the line of fire.

[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Crensch 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

And you're unwilling to share any of that information, thereby condemning people like me to eternal ignorance. How selfish.

I don't care about you, or your opinion.

If we're talking about construction workers, I agree. If we're talking about a highly social job like police work, I strongly disagree. There are things women do better than men and vice versa.

Women don't make decisions on anything but emotion. The only thing they do better than men is manipulate men.

Having no women on a police force would be overall detrimental.

This is so wrong it's silly. But nothing will convince you otherwise.

Women are a detriment, in every sense of the word, to any workplace. Period.

As I've shown, they really don't get shot often and when they do, it's rarely a situation which requires pulling them into cover. Long shoot-outs are not common.

As if this is a counterargument. You're right, because of fats and women, cops are not required to be able to carry their comrades or wounded civilians away from danger.

I'm happy we had this conversation.