When you feel like you need a break :)
This subverse is a dwelling place where all the funny things reside.
1.Tag NSFW material in your title.
2.No clickbait sites. (If the image is from a clickbait site, please use the image address instead of the original web address.)
Guidelines-
we are not looking to define speech and then remove content that contains that speech. In this spirit we will remove spam, illegal material, personal information and nothing else. Leaving it to the community to cast their voat and decide what they want to about your content! happy posting
If it makes you laugh - share it here, just don''t be a dingus! We're all here to have a good time.
Also check out some other knee-slapping subverses!
/v/comedy
/v/jokes
/v/JobStories
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 8Hz_WAN_IP 1 point 10 points 11 points (+11|-1) ago
Neither does transmitting top secret information on non secure networks. That is the point.
[–] laikaislost 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Case history is pretty clear on the issue that it requires intent. No one has ever been convicted by a court for just accidentally removing classified documents, those people have only had administrative punishment. It would not be right to hold Clinton to a different standard than the other cases in history just because we don't like her.
This is the point Comey was making, which fell on deaf ears apparently.
[–] intrepiddemise 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Under 18 USC 793:
"(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."
She set up a private e-mail server to do her official (and unofficial) work while acting as Secretary of State, despite knowing that there was an official option (government servers, which are required). Her use of an unsecured server to conduct official business, knowing that some of the information she received might be classified, constitutes gross negligence: by default, those classified documents were "removed from [their] proper place of custody".
If there's one thing that flies in the face of what you've said here, it's the the FBI director said that she was "extremely careless" with classified information (his exact words). However, somehow that does not qualify as "gross negligence" under 18 USC 793. He did not explain how that could be the case, and his conclusion that she should not be prosecuted seemed in direct opposition to what he had said about her right before his stated decision not to indict.
[–] 8Hz_WAN_IP 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/kristian-saucier-investigation-hillary-clinton-223646