0
1

[–] EveryPlayWins 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'd even go so far as to say that many on Voat can't even decide what free speech is. There are some subvoats around here that I'd posit are violating this sites rules on free speech, but I'm not dumb enough to think anything would be done about it.

Any subvoat that passes rules that basically stiffle dissenting opinions should be disallowed here. Otherwise, we are just on Reddit 2.0

0
1

[–] Sosacms 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

In their defense, those two words are awfully long....

1
1

[–] totes_magotes 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I find it offensive that people would want to limit the First Amendment.

There, we're my protections against this kind of treasonous behavior?

0
1

[–] goatboy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The courts have decided what free speech is. It is all speech that does not incite violence or child porn.

It's actually pretty simple and not controversial.

1
0

[–] basedputin 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

in before hate speech laws. big brother is always watching (well at least in germany and britain).