0
15

[–] middle_path 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

This is a huge problem. I'm not a white supremacist, but this shit is dangerous as hell. I can even understand (but not condone) when an individual website bans users or communities for this stuff because it's their company and they can do what they want with it. But the internet is not a company, it's a utility. Are we going to start cutting off water and electricity to white supremacist too?

2
5

[–] CallASpadeASpade 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

I'm not a white supremacist

Why not? Which race is better?

0
2

[–] DaveIRL 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Members of the different races each have their own strengths and weaknesses. I view it as such— racial differences, race realism if you will— rather than superior or inferior as that's based on the individual cafeterias that is being measured.

  • For example, whites' double-edge sword of compassion that abolished slavery also contain white guilt whereas other races (in the same scenario) may not compromise their in-group preferences, but also would have taken longer regarding the abolition of slavery.

0
5

[–] EarthGleaner 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Yup, enormous slippery slope. It only goes downhill from here. No only that, I'm sure that there was an ISIS website they could have taken down first...

1
1

[–] KILLtheRATS 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Please stop using "white supremacist". They dont exist and the term makes the user look like a corporate media consumer. Just say "White nationalist". You know, if you want

0
4

[–] 10285282 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

What do you mean they don't exist?

0
0

[–] madhatter67 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Even better....use the term white pride....thats cuts through nations and doesn't imply being violent or anything other than being proud of what you are

1
0

[–] middle_path 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I think it would be hard to argue that the daily stormer isn't populated by actual white supremacists. I wouldn't make that argument for Voat, but i would for TDS.

0
3

[–] ArcherMcTaco 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

When you take on this kind of responsibility you are now responsible for ALL speech on your platform. This means all that you do not remove you are now endorsing. This is the reason companies originally took a hands off approach, because of the liability involved. Now ICANN is liable for any and all ISIS terrorism websites and aid to the enemy and can't use free speech as an excuse.

The pandoras box this just opened is insane....

0
2

[–] bdmthrfkr 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I love how the left is cheering this as some kind of massive strike against fascism but not even seeing that their heads will be on the chopping block next.

As soon as they aren't needed anymore they will be digitally erased as well.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] PonchoKitty 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

meshnet

redpill me.

0
0

[–] NonyaBidness 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Namecoin?

0
0

[–] Tbear05 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

No Bueno ppl.