Posted by: DenverBroncos
Posting time: 5.4 years ago on 7/23/2015 9:02:49 PM
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 1389
SCP: 6
6 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
~1 user(s) here now
Be civil
Posts must promote discussion and be specific to fitness
No advertising or market research
To lose weight, you must eat fewer calories than you use - a deficit.
To gain weight, you must eat more calories than you use - a surplus.
To build muscle, you must eat at a surplus and do resistance training.
To get the "toned" look, you need to build muscle and have low bodyfat.
Write @nilceps to have your health subverse added to the sidebar.
Our modlog:
Removed Submissions
Removed Comments
Banned Users
NSFW: No Authorized: No Anon: No Private: No Type: Default
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Content or User violates User Agreement
Hi, it looks like you're new. Welcome to Voat!
Voat is a censorship-free community platform where content is submitted, organized, moderated and voted on (ranked) by the users.
Archived General consensus of fat burners? (fitness)
submitted 5.4 years ago by DenverBroncos
I'd like to keep this discussion on the topic of the fat burning supplements, not ways to lose weight as there are millions of topics about that. Fat burning pills/powders claim to help in weight loss. Have there been any studies to support the claims? I feel like anybody can just throw a proprietary blend of whatever together and market it as whatever they want. Where does one find factual evidence that these supplements work?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] nilceps 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) 5.4 years ago
Citation needed
view the rest of the comments →
[–] nilceps 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Citation needed