You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] scootycreampuff 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Because they identify with the horrible notion that she was a size 14. She may have been, but that size 14 today was more like a 2 or 4. Which is still funny because this fat looks like an 18 or 20 easily.

0
2

[–] Carsandsarcasm 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It doesn't matter what size she was, though. She could have been a size 130, but we have the pictures showing she's not fat. I simply don't understand how hams can say she was fat "because size 14" when we can look at the pictures and see she wasn't? I'm completely serious when I say this piece of fat logic bothers me more than any other. It's like looking at a ball and calling it a cube. It's just not. It doesn't matter what anyone says, it's clearly a ball. It can't be possible not to see this.