Posted by: skyhigh2
Posting time: 5.1 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 1075
SCP: 16
20 upvotes, 4 downvotes (83% upvoted it)
~31 user(s) here now
NSFW: No
Authorized: No
Anon: No
Private: No
Type: Default
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Fentiaz 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
She is fucking 5 feet, she is going to weigh less than taller people, fucking fat fucks
[–] Grave_Mercy 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
I'm 5'0" and i'm 105 at the moment. I don't believe she's 92lbs in that pic on the right. I look like that at 105 and just a few lbs is a huge difference when you're 5'0"
http://www.mybodygallery.com/uploadedPhotos/2000/2520-1.jpg
This is 5'0" at 88lbs and very clearly underweight. At this point you might no longer have periods. You're more likely to break bones in a fall as you probably have a calcium deficiency and if you still have periods you are additional risks. There's some additional risks in severe cases like organ failure and shit because your heart and lungs weaken over time. When I was at 103 I still had irregular periods but I was becoming anemic and during particularly heavy periods I would sometimes be unable to stand. Eventually I was medicated (for PCOS surprise surprise) and now my weight fluctuates between 105 and 108 and has for over a decade since I've been medicated. The girl in the post obviously wants to be underweight. She mentions she's struggled with eating disorders and body image. I don't think we should be coming to her defense. But the whales have no right to harp at her either. At this point I would encourage her to keep healthy habits (and it's good she's seeing professional therapy during all this) but I would never ever fucking tell someone to "go eat a cheeseburger" when you can tell in her pics she's is within a healthy weight at the moment.
[–] skyhigh2 [S] 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
http://www.mybodygallery.com/search.html?gender=female&height=152&age=any&weight=41&pantSize=any&shirtSize=any&bodytype=
[–] mmmmdonuts 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thank you, it didn't look right to me either. I'm 4'11, 97lbs, and muscular. Her before pic on the left makes her look around 115 to 120, and her after pic looks more like 105. Something's fishy, maybe her scale is broken, as she looks way fatter in the before pic. She doesn't weigh as low as she is claiming, it's like she wants a reaction out of the whales.
[–] LoseWeightNotH8 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
I think it's possible to be ok at a 17.2 bmi if you have no muscle tone like op's pics. But if she decides to actually get some muscle to be more shapely than 105 is probably better.
[–] WhatTheFat 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
After I had my first kid and lost baby weight, I was 102-103 pounds. I was 160 before I had the baby, so I lost damn near 60 pounds. I got so much shit for it! "Do you not eat? You're losing too much! You look anorexic. Are you under 100 pounds yet?" Bitch I'm 4 foot 11 inches!! I'm SUPPOSED to be this small. Of course comments all from fat women, "family" ugh. Like fuck off people. Now I'm pregnant again, and I'm sure they celebrated that I'm "gonna get fat again." Well guess what, after I pop this puppy out, I'll be back to my pre-baby weight again, and I'll get those anorexia comments again. Well too bad ladies, I take your hate as a compliment. When they found out I was pregnant again, they started asking if I should still be going to the gym. Yes...working out is always good for you.
[–] Fentiaz 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yes being active is GOOD for the baby. Fuck some women can't wait to get pregnant to have an excuse to finally do NOTHING and stay/become fat and not feel bad about it